|
|
|
|
|
|
Report To:
|
Public
Transport Committee
|
|
Meeting
Date:
|
22
September 2022
|
|
Report
Authoriser:
|
Mat Taylor
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Summary
This report
highlights matters of interest that the Committee Chair considers to be
relevant to the business of the Public Transport Committee.
The
report includes updates on:
· National
and local context including Sustainable Public Transport Framework, NZ Bus
change of ownership, responses to driver shortages, fair pay agreements, and
Covid-19 response update, transport patronage, Tauranga CBD interchange, Waka
Kotahi Transport Choices Package, Public Transport Services and
Infrastructure Business Case, Rotorua bus network refresh, bus
decarbonisation feasibility study, on-demand public transport trial, regional
fares review, and management effectiveness.
|
Recommendations
That the Public
Transport Committee:
1 Receives the report, Chairperson's Report.
1. Purpose
The purpose of
this report is to make Committee members aware of items of interest in relation
to public transport.
2. Matters
of Potential Interest
2.1 Council
Updates and National Context
2.1.1 Sustainable Public Transport Framework
On
Monday, 15 August the government announced they will be changing how public
transport is delivered, with the launch of the Sustainable Public Transport
Framework (SPTF). This follows a review of the Public Transport Model (PTOM)
and will replace the PTOM.
SPTF
will allow local authorities to bring bus operations back in-house, which is
how most public transport services were delivered until the early 1990s when
the government required all operations to be outsourced.
The
government stated that establishing the SPTF will result in the following key
reforms:
· Establishing new objectives for the planning, procurement, and
delivery of public transport services, to be embedded in the Land Transport
Management Act 2003
· Enabling in-house delivery of public transport services (public
transport authorities will be able to operate public transport services, e.g.,
own buses, employ bus drivers, and run services themselves)
· Requiring services to be procured, contracted and/or delivered in
such a way that ensures transparency of operating costs, service performance,
the vehicles or vessels used to deliver services, aggregate employee terms and
conditions, and financial performance of operators.
· Enabling different asset ownership arrangements, including public
transport authorities owning assets directly
· Encourage greater collaboration between regional councils and
territorial authorities in preparing regional public transport plans
· Changes to the framework for exempt services (including commercial
and inter-regional public transport services)
· Including on-demand public transport services (services like
‘MyWay’ in Timaru and ‘AT Local’ in South Auckland) in
the Sustainable Public Transport Framework.
The reforms will be implemented through a combination
of amendments to the Land Transport Management Act 2003 and through the
development of operational policy.
2.1.2 NZ Bus Change of Ownership
The NZ Bus Group, which includes NZ Bus
Tauranga Limited was sold to Kinetic NZ Holdings Ltd, with the sale completion
taking place on Friday, 19 August 2022. The sale was subject to several
conditions, including Overseas Investment Office approval and Commerce
Commission approval, both of which were granted.
2.1.3 Responses to Driver Shortages
Like
many industries in New Zealand, staff shortages are an acute problem and the
absence of sufficient driver numbers is dramatically impacting on the transport
sector nationally.
As a result of driver shortages in
the Western Bay of Plenty, Council continues to operate a reduced
timetable. NZ Bus and Council will regularly review the situation with a view
to increasing the provision of services as soon as possible. Dedicated school
services continue to operate to a normal timetable.
Kinetic have already begun to work to address the
driver shortages with a range of measures. This includes writing to Minister
Wood regarding the current rules prohibiting employing overseas workers as the
industry does not currently pay the median wage. NZ Bus are requesting an
exemption to the median wage threshold for bus drivers as an interim measure
until the outcome of central government initiatives to improve driver pay and
conditions materialise.
Council also wrote to Hon Michael Wood asking that the
criteria for long-term critical workers is urgently amended to include those
workers required to deliver public transport services, either directly or by
including public transport services in the list of ‘major
government-approved programmes’.
2.1.4 Fair Pay Agreements
Earlier this year, the Government introduced the Fair
Pay Agreements Bill which provides a framework for bargaining for fair pay
agreements. The objective is to improve labour market outcomes in New Zealand
by enabling employers and employees to collectively bargain industry-wide or
occupation-wide minimum employment terms. The Bill is expected to pass later
this year.
2.1.5 Covid-19
Response Update
The public transport industry is expected to be one of
the first to be addressed under the new framework. Discussions have
already commenced within the sector in anticipation of this.
On 12 September
the Government announced that the COVID-19 Protection Framework (CPF) Order
will be revoked – this moves New Zealand away from the detailed traffic
light settings.
This removes the current face mask
wearing requirement on public transport services and inside public
transport stations. To clarify, face masks (coverings) will no longer be
required on any public transport services or in any public transport
station/terminal. This came into effect at 11.59pm, Monday 12 September
2022.
2.1.6 Patronage
Update
Bus Patronage for all services over the fourth quarter
of 2021/22 was 625,961, which is down 15.4% on the same period 2020/21.
Tauranga remains on a reduced timetable due to the
reduced availability of bus drivers. The year-on-year decline reflects the impact
COVID-19 has had on passenger transport patronage in the Bay of Plenty, and the
rest of New Zealand.
The introduction of half price fares on 1 April 2022
encouraged a brief increase to patronage for the month of April, with patronage
dropping back in May and June, reflective of broader seasonal trends. The
Government announced on Sunday 17 July that half prices fares would be extend
to the 31 January 2023.
Data suggests following the introduction of half price
fares, patronage has increased by an average of 16.44% on the average of the
three weeks preceding the initiative. However, for the weeks following the
April school holidays, there has been a general downward trend in patronage
which reflects 2020/21 seasonality trends outlined in the graph below:
More detail can be found in the Public Transport Arotake Tuawha 2021/22 Performance Monitoring
Report contained in the Agenda.
2.1.7 Tauranga
CBD Interchange
All Regional Council funded bus routes were relocated
from Willow Street to the Durham Street temporary interchange on 13 June 2022.
The relocation of the Willow Street interchange makes way for the development
of the new civic precinct – Te Manawataki O Te Papa and is a temporary
solution while a new permanent transportation hub is developed.
Regional Council staff have worked closely with
Tauranga City Council to resolve snagging issues at the temporary site, the
most significant being the lack of a hub / rest area for the security staff. A
premises has now been secured on Wharf Street, with security staff moving in mid-September.
Tauranga City Council have also progressed work on the
permanent CBD transportation hub. TCC’s “City Centre Action and
Investment Plan” (CCAIP) has identified Durham Street & Hamilton
Street as the preferred long-term public transport spine through the CBD, as
shown in Figure 1.
The CCAIP also proposes a pedestrianised laneway
connection between Durham St and Grey St. This would substantially enhance
pedestrian connectivity between the new interchange and the Eastern areas of
the CBD.
TCC have recently concluded the tender process for the
delivery of a Single Stage Business Case to identify a suitable location(s) for
a public transport hub(s) within the City Centre, along the identified PT
spine. This process will be supported by Regional Council staff. It should be
noted that this business case has a very ambitious six-month timescale.
Figure 1 – “City Centre Key
Moves” Plan (CCAIP)
2.1.8 Waka
Kotahi Transport Choices Package
The New Zealand Government has funded the Transport
Choices Package from the Climate Emergency Response Fund. $350m has been
allocated over two years (to mid-2024) to design and implement the package.
The scheme is looking to make a concentrated impact
across specific locations to improve travel choices and reduce emissions. The
focus is on infrastructure which can be delivered quickly and not the funding
of services.
BOPRC staff submitted for funding through this scheme
to cover two projects:
1. Refreshing
and Enhancing Public Transport in Rotorua
The proposed network refresh (further detail in
section 2.1.10) requires some new infrastructure for implementation, where
there is currently no clear funding pathway. In addition, there is the opportunity
to deliver some infrastructure enhancements to further enhance the customer
experience and encourage patronage growth. Funding has been requested for the
following sub-projects, and is supported by Rotorua Lakes Council:
a) Provision
of 2 new bus stops and shelters on Amahau Street
The new stops on Amahau Street (SH30a) would enable
all 4 sides of the CBD to be served by all PT routes. This has the advantage of
substantially improving connectivity to all areas of the CBD from the Rotorua
suburbs, enhancing access to both employment and recreational destinations. It
also enhances connectivity within the CBD itself, with all routes
“orbiting” the city centre. Enabling this type of movement was
clearly identified through recent consultation exercises.
b) Provision
of high-quality shelters at landmark Rotorua locations
To support the success of the Rotorua Network Refresh,
a significant opportunity has been identified to install high-quality shelters
in prominent locations. This would both vastly enhance the passenger
experience, whilst significantly enhancing the attractiveness and appeal of
public transport. Locations include: Rotorua Lakefront, Toi Ohomai (Mokoia
Campus), Arawa Street (Eastbound) and Rotorua Airport.
c) Supplementary
funding for Rotorua Lakes District Council’s shelter improvement
programme
To support the success of the Rotorua Network Refresh,
a significant opportunity has been identified to expedite Rotorua Lakes
District Council’s shelter improvement programme. Lack of shelter may
well impact on the appeal of the bus service to people vulnerable to weather
conditions, including; disabled people, aged persons, and young families. Rotorua
Lakes Council have identified 7 sites where additional funding would enable the
provision of new/improved shelters to be expedited in line with the time
aspirations of the Transport Choices fund.
d) Transport
Demand Management (TDM) to support the success of the refreshed network
Research indicates that the greatest uptake of
sustainable transport modes is achieved where infrastructure and service
improvements are delivered in conjunction with promotional incentives such as
campaigns, events, and activities.
2. Enhanced
Customer Experience on the Tauranga Urban Network
Whilst substantial activities are already underway in
Tauranga, there is an opportunity to deliver enhancements to the onboard bus
environment and passenger experience. Bus user and non-user surveys have
highlighted the desire for buses to have onboard visual and audio stop
announcements.
This would substantially increase the travelling
experience of existing customers, as well as improve the attractiveness of the
service to new users who may not be familiar or confident with using public
transport. This would especially assist our most vulnerable customers.
2.1.9 Public
Transport Services & Infrastructure Business Case
This business case is exploring the enhancements
needed to both the public transport services and supporting infrastructure
enable the delivery of the “Connected Centres” programme identified
by UFTI. It has a 10-year horizon and a 30-year outlook.
The project is being delivered in partnership by
BOPRC, Tauranga City Council, Waka Kotahi, Western Bay of Plenty District
Council and Mana Whenua.
Work has now concluded on the production of a
“Public Transport Reference Case”. This area of the business case
has been expediated to provide consistent and accurate public transport
assumptions to the various other transport projects ongoing around Tauranga and
the Western Bay.
The work to produce the Reference Case considered
several network structures, which were presented and scored at a stakeholder
workshop. This identified the potential benefit of developing a
“hybrid” network structure, utilising both “through routing”
and “hub and spoke”.
The “Public Transport Reference Case”
aligns with both the RLTP, the draft RPTP and has the capacity to support the
emerging Vehicle Kilometres Travelled (VKT) / Emissions Reduction Plan (ERP)
targets.
Customer focus has also been at the heart of the
Reference Case development. Compared with other network structures, initial
analysis suggests that the hybrid model:
· Offers
access to the highest proportion of employment (both current and future)
without the need to transfer,
· Has
the lowest transfer requirement (and travel time) for travel between UFTI
“Connected Centres”, and;
· Has
the lowest operating cost, due to the efficient use of capacity.
The hybrid network is also easily scalable to serve
both growing demand and development areas and does not preclude other methods
of service delivery (such as on-demand) in suburban areas. The network could
also be complimented by park and ride sites, should these be progressed.
Members of the Tauranga Joint Public Transport Committee
were briefed on the progress of this work on 22 August 2022.
The next stage of this project is to commence work on
the single stage business case, which will continue developing the reference
case and consider the infrastructure requirements in further detail. The tender
process has recently concluded for this work, which is expected to take
approximately 12 months to complete.
2.1.10 Rotorua
Bus Network Refresh
Feedback was sought from the community during a
comprehensive campaign held from 26 April to 24 May 2022. Some initial findings
were reported to the Public Transport Committee on 23 June 2022. Staff have now
finished reviewing all consultation submissions and have made several changes
to the network refresh proposals after carefully considering the suggestions
made. The latest network is shown in Figure 2. The updates proposed include:
· Retaining
buses on Vaughan Road
· Establishing
two separate loops around Ngongotahā. These looped
services would alternate, providing an hourly service on each. A 30-minute
frequency would be maintained on the core route between Ngongotahā,
Rotorua and Tihitonga. This would both maintain the shorter journey
times and increase the number of roads that are able to be serviced. This would
see services retained on Western Road (as far as Pioneer Road), Mohi Crescent, Frances Street, Hood Street and School Road.
· Extending
south along Old Taupō Road as far as Springfield Road, rather than travelling
along Otonga Road.
· Retaining
buses on Orion Street.
· Looping
buses around Rimuvale Street, Hinau Street, Tawavale Street
and Totaravale Street.
· Enhancing
coverage of Malfroy Road, via Amohau Street/Pukuatua Street.
This improves access to Trade Central as well as to a number of high schools.
· Finding
new locations for the proposed Westbound stop on Arawa Street
and Northbound stop on Amohia Street.
Figure 2 – Latest proposed
network, following consultation feedback
Suggestions were made to consider ways to integrate
and reflect Rotorua’s rich culture, including the use of te reo
Māori to establish a stronger identity for both the bus routes and public
transport in general. It was suggested to use te reo numbers 1-5 as bus route
names. Further cultural connections, such as changes to bus branding could also
be considered. It is proposed that this is discussed with tangata whenua, to
first get support but also receive guidance as to the appropriateness and
tastefulness of any cultural reflections.
Critical to the implementation of the refreshed
network is the installation of two new bus stops on Amohau Street (SH30a), in
the vicinity of Rotorua Central Mall. There is currently no clear funding
pathway for these new stops. To this end, funding has been requested through
Waka Kotahi’s Transport Choices Fund. Other pathways will be explored
(such as the potential reallocation of existing Low-Cost Low Risk funding),
should this application be unsuccessful. Once the infrastructure challenges
have been overcome, a deliverable plan will be brought back to the Public
Transport Committee for approval.
2.1.11 Bus Decarbonisation
Feasibility Study
Work is now
well underway on Phase 1 & 2 of the feasibility study into how the urban and
school bus fleet in the Bay of Plenty will be decarbonised by 2035, in line
with the recent Government mandate. The study will include considerations
around electric vs. hydrogen buses, biofuels, repurposing/recycling of the
existing bus fleet, sustainable procurement of new Zero Emission Buses (ZEBs),
depot design, driver training and more. The product to be created through the
feasibility study is a Programme Business Case (PBC), which will set out a
short list of options for consideration by a future Detailed Business Case
(DBC). In this way, the bus decarbonisation work demonstrates compliance with
the Waka Kotahi Business Case Approach (BCA).
Phase 1 of the work is to establish
and maintain a database of available reports and news items in relation to bus
decarbonisation, which can be used to inform the feasibility study.
Phase 2 of the work is to understand
decarbonisation marketplace, exploring options for reducing bus emissions in
the short-term and long-term. This will consider the maturity of the different
solutions, supply chains, an understanding of each component from production
(both energy and vehicle), through transmission, distribution, storage and then
to the operation of the bus system itself.
It is anticipated that Phase 1 &
2 of the work will conclude in late 2022. Phase 3 & 4 of the project (which
are yet to be procured) will then explore future operational scenarios, define
potential pathways to decarbonisation and conclude with the production of the
programme business case.
2.1.12 On-Demand
Public Transport Trial
Staff have commissioned work to
progress the feasibility of an on-demand PT Trial. This was in response to the
direction provided during the Annual Plan workshops, where staff were asked to
explore options for a “scaled down” trial.
It is anticipated that a detailed
progress update will be provided to future a PTC meeting.
2.1.13 Regional
Fares Review
It is anticipated that the review
will be undertaken later this year, with findings reported to the PTC early
next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report To:
|
Public
Transport Committee
|
|
Meeting
Date:
|
22
September 2022
|
|
Report
Writer:
|
Bron Healey, Principal Advisor,
Regional Development
|
|
Report
Authoriser:
|
Mat
Taylor, General Manager, Corporate
|
|
Purpose:
|
To seek the Committee’s endorsement
of the Bay of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan 2022-32 and a
recommendation to the Regional Council to approve the Plan.
|
|
|
|
Bay
of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan 2022-32
|
Executive Summary
This
report seeks the Public Transport Committee’s endorsement of the Bay of
Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan 2022-32 (RPTP) and a recommendation to
the Regional Council to approve the Plan.
The
draft RPTP was approved for public consultation by the Public Transport
Committee at its 23 June 2022 meeting following a comprehensive review
process. The RPTP was subsequently released for public consultation, with
submissions being received between 4 – 29 July.
A
total of 65 submissions were received on the draft RPTP, 21 from organisations
or groups, and 44 from individuals. Twenty submitters presented their
submissions to the Hearings Subcommittee at hearings conducted on the 17 and
19 August 2022. Deliberations were then held on the 31 August and 1
September. The Hearings Subcommittee subsequently requested a number of
changes to the draft RPTP in response to submissions.
This
report summarises the Hearing Subcommittee’s recommendations on the
following key recurring themes in submissions:
· Boldness/transformational
change/step change
· Funding/financial
Information
· Challenges/opportunities
· Vision
statement
· Targets
· Performance
measurement
· Consolidation
of public transport functions
· Regional
services
· Zero
emission public transport
· Passenger
rail
· Service
patronage
· On
demand public transport
· Rapid
transit
· Propulsion
technologies
· Bus
stops/shelters
· Safety
and security issues
· School
services
· Ferries
· Event
services
· Infrastructure
quality/accessibility
· Accessible
buses
· Provision
for other modes (cycling/micro mobility)
· Exploring
new innovations/technologies
· Extension
of SuperGold concession
· Action/implementation
plan
· Bus
service changes
More
detailed individual responses based on these recommendations and in response
to unique submission points will be sent to each submitter.
The
Hearing Subcommittee made two additional recommendations to the Public
Transport Committee. These are outside the scope of the RPTP but respond to
points raised by submitters. The two recommendations are:
· That the
Public Transport Committee makes a recommendation to the Regional Council to
consider investigating potential co-investment opportunities in public
transport infrastructure with the region’s territorial local
authorities; and
· That the
Public Transport Committee makes a recommendation to the Regional Council to
consider continuing the Extension of SuperGold Concession beyond the current
trial end date.
The report also provides a section-by-section summary of
the recommended changes to the draft RPTP that was released for public
consultation. These are shown in track changes in the attached RPTP document.
|
Recommendations
That the Public Transport Committee:
1 Receives the report, Bay of Plenty Regional Public
Transport Plan 2022-32.
2 Approves the Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing
Subcommittee’s recommendations on the draft Bay of Plenty Regional Public
Transport Plan 2022-2032 as summarised in the report.
3 Notes the following additional recommendations from the
Regional Public Transport Plan Hearing Subcommittee:
(a) That the Public Transport Committee makes a recommendation
to the Regional Council to consider investigating potential co-investment
opportunities in public transport infrastructure with the region’s
territorial local authorities; and
(b) That the Public Transport Committee makes a recommendation
to the Regional Council to consider continuing the
Extension of SuperGold Concession beyond the current trial end date.
4 Endorses the Bay of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan
2022-2032 in Attachment 1 including any amendments arising from discussion of
the report.
5 Delegates to the Chief Executive the authority to make
minor changes to the draft Bay of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan
2022-2032 prior to its approval by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council.
That the Public
Transport Committee recommends that the Regional Council:
1 Receives the report, Bay of Plenty Regional Public
Transport Plan 2022-2032.
2 Notes that the Public Transport Committee has prepared the
draft Bay of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan 2022-2032 on the Regional
Council’s behalf in accordance with the Land Transport Management Act
2003.
3 Approves the Bay of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan
2022-2032.
4 Considers investigating potential co-investment
opportunities in public transport infrastructure with the region’s
territorial local authorities.
5 Considers continuing the Extension of SuperGold Concession
beyond the current trial end date.
1. Introduction
This report seeks the Public
Transport Committee’s endorsement of the Bay of Plenty Regional Public
Transport Plan 2022-32 (RPTP) and a recommendation to the Regional Council to
approve the Plan.
As members will recall, the
draft RPTP was approved for public consultation by the Public Transport
Committee at its 23 June 2022 meeting following a comprehensive review process.
The RPTP was subsequently released for public consultation, with submissions
being received between 4 – 29 July.
A total of 65 submissions were
received on the draft RPTP, 21 from organisations or groups, and 44 from
individuals. The Hearings Subcommittee made the decision to accept three late
submissions. Twenty submitters presented their submissions to the Hearings
Subcommittee at hearings conducted on the 17 and 19 August 2022.
Deliberations were held on the
31 August and 1 September. The Hearings Subcommittee requested a number of
changes to the draft RPTP in response to submissions. These are summarised in
the report and shown in track changes in the attached draft RPTP document.
1.1 Legislative Framework
The Land Transport Management
Act (LTMA) provides the legislative framework for the development and renewal
of RPTPs. The RPTP is a statutory requirement of the LTMA and a regional
council must adopt an RPTP if it intends to enter into contracts for the supply
of public transport services. The LTMA requires the RPTP to be reviewed at the
same time, or as soon as practicable after the public transport service
components of a Regional Land Transport Plan are approved.
The statutory purpose of the RPTP in the LTMA is:
· a means for
encouraging regional councils and public transport operators to work together
in developing public transport services and infrastructure,
· an instrument
for engaging with the public in the region on the design and operation of the
public transport network, and
· to provide a
statement of:
o the public transport services
that are integral to the public transport network,
o the policies and procedures that
apply to those services, and
o the information and
infrastructure that support those services.
1.2 Alignment with Strategic
Framework
|
A Vibrant Region
|
We lead
regional transport strategy and system planning, working with others to
deliver a safe and reliable public transport system.
|
1.2.1 Community Well-beings Assessment
|
Dominant Well-Beings Affected
|
|
þ Environmental
Low -
Positive
|
þ Cultural
Low -
Positive
|
þ Social
Medium
- Positive
|
þ Economic
Medium
- Positive
|
Public transport planning and delivery has positive social
and economic outcomes for our communities. Well planned and effective public
transport enables people of all ages and abilities to access a wide range of social
and economic activities.
Public transport contributes to positive environmental
outcomes through reduced transport emissions when people choose to take public
transport instead of private vehicle trips. These environmental outcomes are
further enhanced when the public transport trip is in a zero emission vehicle.
Public transport also contributes to positive cultural
outcomes (refer to the Implications for Māori section of this report).
2. Submissions
58% of submissions were received
through the Participate online consultation portal, predominantly from the
public. The remainder were received by email or post.
The Participate submission form
asked submitters a number of questions on key elements of the draft RPTP,
recording their responses on a qualitative sliding scale. Submitters’
responses to Participate survey questions generally indicated high levels of
support for elements of the RPTP strategic direction (challenges,
opportunities, vision, objectives, focus areas).
Key recurring themes in all submissions
received included:
· General
support for direction of the Plan and the development process
· Recognition
and a sense of urgency about climate change/need to reduce emissions
· Recognition
of links between public transport and land use/urban transformation goals and
the need for integration
· Questions about the ambitiousness of the Plan and some targets/calls
for step change/transformative action
· Seeking
more detail on funding/how plans will be funded
· Questions
about the current model of providing public transport e.g. separation of
functions for service and infrastructure provision
· Support
for alternative public transport modes e.g. rail, light rail, ferries
· Strong
interest in transitioning to zero emission public transport
· Strong
interest in On Demand Public Transport and other alternative delivery models
· Recognition/support
for a stronger public transport role in intra and inter-regional connectivity
· Seeking
development of a more detailed implementation plan/performance
measures/monitoring framework
· Requests
for changes to bus services (routes, frequencies, operating times/days)
· Requests
for changes to bus stops/infrastructure (e.g. locations, shelters)
Consequently, a number of key
topics were identified. These formed the basis for the key recommendations in
the following section. The key topics are:
· Boldness/transformational
change/step change
· Funding/financial
Information
· Challenges/opportunities
· Vision
statement
· Targets
· Performance
measurement
· Consolidation
of public transport functions
· Regional
services
· Zero
emission public transport
· Passenger
rail
· Service
patronage
· On
demand public transport
· Rapid
transit
· Propulsion
technologies
· Bus
stops/shelters
· Safety
and security issues
· School
services
· Ferries
· Event
services
· Infrastructure
quality/accessibility
· Accessible
buses
· Provision
for other modes (cycling/micro mobility)
· Exploring
new innovations/technologies
· Extension
of SuperGold concession
· Action/implementation
plan
· Bus
service changes
3. Recommendations
This section summarises the
Hearing Subcommittee’s recommendations on the key themes. More detailed
individual responses based on these recommendations and in response to unique submission
points will be sent to each submitter.
3.1 Key recommendations
3.1.1 Boldness/transformational change/step
change
Several submitters questioned
whether the RPTP was bold enough or would deliver transformational change
considering the challenges facing the region/Western Bay of Plenty subregion.
Recommendation:
Accept
We recognise that the Plan must
be bold and aspirational to achieve the transformational change that is needed.
Add vision statement to front of
RPTP.
Add a statement of network
aspirations/what the RPTP will deliver to support a more aspirational mode
share target to the front of the RPTP.
Revise sections 1.2.3 (Reviewing
the RPTP) and 1.3 (Developing this RPTP) to recognise:
· The highly
dynamic and constantly changing operating environment.
· The need for
public transport agencies to be flexible and nimble in response.
· Recent
Government policy decisions that have set ambitious new targets and will enable
greater flexibility and responsiveness in the future delivery of public
transport. Revise Appendix A (Policy Context) accordingly.
· The
Regional Council, through the Public Transport Committee, will be the champion
for public transport in the region.
3.1.2 Funding/financial Information
Some submitters sought more
funding or financial information in the RPTP or asked how activities would be
funded.
Recommendation:
The purpose of a Regional Public
Transport Plan (RPTP) is set out in the Land Transport Management Act. This is:
(a) a means for encouraging
regional councils and public transport operators to work together in developing
public transport services and infrastructure; and
(b) an instrument for engaging
with the public in the region on the design and operation of the public
transport network; and
(c) a statement of—
(i) the public transport
services that are integral to the public transport network; and
(ii) the policies and procedures
that apply to those services; and
(iii) the information and
infrastructure that support those services.
The RPTP is primarily a policy
document, setting the policy framework for the delivery of public transport in
the region. The approach in this region (and other regions in New Zealand with
Regional Public Transport Plans) is to set funding levels for public transport
(both infrastructure and services) in the Long Term Plans and Annual Plans of
the respective organisations with public transport functions. The Bay of Plenty
Regional Council forecasts funding and sets rates for public transport
operations in its Long Term Plan.
We accept that more financial
information could be added to the RPTP to provide more clarity.
Add forecast
public transport operational funding and $ amounts to the RPTP.
Add text noting future
investment in public transport will need to be scaled up significantly to meet
ambitious new mode shift and emissions reduction targets. Analysis of the gap
between current funding levels and future requirements will be undertaken once
we have a clearer picture of the implications of the new targets.
We also note that the regular
Public Transport Arotake Tuatoru - Performance Monitoring Report which is
publicly available in the Public Transport Committee agendas has the most
comprehensive, detailed breakdown of financial and patronage information for
public transport in the region. We will ensure this is readily accessible on
the Regional Council website.
3.1.3 Challenges
Two submitters requested that
the affordability challenge of providing public transport infrastructure and
services, particularly in the context of meeting mode shift targets, be
included in the Plan.
Recommendation:
Add additional challenge:
‘Challenge 4: Funding our network’ highlighting disparity between
current funding levels and what will be required to achieve our network
aspirations. Note that local authorities will not be able to fund the future
levels required and a step change in central government funding will be
critical to achieving the aspirational targets in this
Plan. Also note the overly complex funding environment and the limited funding
mechanisms at local government’s disposal.
3.1.4 Vision
statement
Some submitters noted the vision
statement didn’t reference accessibility (particularly for
rural/non-urban parts of the region) despite this being identified as a key
challenge/opportunity.
Recommendation:
There is a strong policy thread
throughout the RPTP concerned with improving access/connectivity for
communities outside the region’s main urban centres. This is not
explicitly captured in the draft vision statement.
Recommend the vision statement
be amended to read: ‘More people using convenient, accessible
public transport that enhances their lives, supports urban transformation and
regional connectivity, while reducing our collective impact on the
environment’.
3.1.5 Targets
Many
submitters sought more information on the RPTP targets or questioned whether
they were sufficiently ambitious, particularly the mode shift target.
Recommendation:
Accept
Add a more aspirational mode
share target to the Plan.
We note that the Government has
recently released new national targets in the New Zealand Emissions Reduction
Plan. A key target for transport is to reduce total kilometres travelled by the
light fleet by 20 per cent by 2035 through improved urban form and providing
better travel options, particularly in our largest cities. Public transport is
a key mode for achieving these better travel options.
The Ministry of Transport is now
working with partner agencies to develop sub-national light vehicle kilometres
travelled targets for the main urban areas in New Zealand, including Tauranga and
Rotorua. According to current timeframes, these are due to be released before
the end of 2022.
As part of this process, we are
working with urgency to better understand public transport’s expected
contribution to achieving these targets, and the levels of investment required
to deliver this. This includes additional work at the sub-regional level with
TSP partner agencies to quantify what this means for current TSP targets.
Once
these are clarified, the RPTP will need to be updated through a variation to
the Plan.
3.1.6 Performance measurement
A number of submitters raised
questions about measuring the performance of the RPTP.
Recommendation:
Accept
Update Part 5 of the RPTP to
include reference to the development of an implementation plan for the RPTP.
The RPTP monitoring framework (for the performance measures identified in 5.2)
will form a key part of the implementation plan.
Update
5.3 to include mode share (including its contribution to carbon reduction),
vehicle kilometres travelled (vkt), and benchmarking with other regions.
We note that an emissions
reduction model is currently being developed for Tauranga/Western Bay of plenty
sub-region. This will assist with quantifying the impact of different
interventions on reducing emissions.
We also note that several
measures are currently reported in the regular Public Transport Arotake Tuatoru
- Performance Monitoring Report which is publicly available in the Public
Transport Committee agendas. We will ensure this is more readily accessible on
the Regional Council website.
3.1.7 Consolidation of public transport
functions
A couple of submitters
questioned whether the current separation of public transport functions would
deliver the desired outcomes for public transport (particularly with reference
to Tauranga/Western Bay of Plenty).
Recommendation:
While determining functional
responsibilities for public transport is largely beyond the scope of matters
that can be addressed within a Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP), the Plan
does include the following key focus area for next three years:
· Collaborative
- We will work with our partners and communities to consider innovative ways of
delivering public transport solutions that meet peoples’ needs.
We note that the Tauranga Public
Transport Joint Committee is proving to be a successful initiative for the
integration of public transport matters in Tauranga city. The Regional Council,
through the Public Transport Committee, is also committed to championing
public transport throughout the region.
Furthermore, the Regional
Council is certainly open to further discussions with partners around new
models of public transport delivery and the RPTP provides an enabling framework
for their consideration.
3.1.8 Regional services
Many submitters were interested
in regional services as a means of providing better connectivity across the
region.
Recommendation:
Our future plan for regional
services is to prepare a more comprehensive regional services strategy to
confirm the longer term regional services network. The intention is to build on
the existing network by developing and implementing a regional network which
provides a convenient and attractive service offering to customers.
This will recognise that
‘intra-regional travel between the centres for various purposes (e.g.
commuting, work-related travel, medical and health services, leisure, tourism
and shopping) is becoming increasingly significant. The location of planned
development on the edges of the urban areas is likely to further increase the
attractiveness of this type of travel. Low service frequencies impact on the
current viability of intraregional services for these trip purposes.’
Add a regional services policy
and supporting action to 4.2.2 (Service planning and design).
3.1.9 Zero emission public transport
Many submitters supported the
transition to a zero emission public transport fleet, although some urged that
the date be brought forward. Several submitters also suggested that smaller,
electric vehicles provided a more attractive service option.
Recommendation:
Zero emission public transport -
Policy 1.4 seeks to transition the region’s public transport fleet to
zero-emission buses in line with Government targets.
Amend the policy to include
consideration of different service options including smaller zero emission
vehicles and on demand public transport.
There is also a supporting
action to undertake a bus fleet decarbonisation feasibility study to understand
the opportunities and constraints of increasing the size of the zero emission
fleet as bus service contracts are renewed and achieving a fully emissions free
public transport bus fleet by 2035.
Key considerations include:
existing contractual arrangements with operators, the timing of new contracts,
planning for the retirement of the current fleet, securing the adequate supply
of replacement zero emission vehicles, and having the necessary charging/fuelling
infrastructure place for a zero emission fleet.
3.1.10 Passenger rail
Many submitters demonstrated a
particular interest in passenger rail as an alternative public transport mode.
Recommendation:
Add a new ‘Opportunity 8
– New public transport modes’ which references investigating the
potential of passenger rail (both intra and inter-regional) as a new public
transport mode.
Policy 1.6 (Passenger Rail)
includes a commitment to work collaboratively with central government and
regional partners to continue exploring the potential for viable inter-regional
passenger rail and/or commuter services in the longer term.
Include additional commitments
to this policy to:
i. advocate
and support rail track improvements between Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga;
ii. support
Government and advocate for the prioritisation of Government-led fast and
frequent rail initiatives connecting New Zealand’s fastest growing cities
of Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga; and
iii. protect
existing rail corridors in the region to ensure they have the necessary
capacity to enable increased use and movement in the future.
3.1.11 Service patronage
Some submitters noted services
needed to be well patronised to be effective.
Recommendation:
Service optimisation –
Policy 2.3 sets minimum patronage expectations for different types of services.
Services which consistently fall below these thresholds will be reviewed to
determine how they can better serve the needs of customers.
The Western Bay of Plenty Public
Transport Services and Infrastructure Business Case is also currently modelling
different options for the Tauranga and the Western Bay of Plenty to determine
the best service operating model for the sub-region (routes, frequencies,
interchange points and supporting infrastructure). Customer focus is at the
heart of this business case.
3.1.12 On demand public transport
Many submitters were strongly
interested in the potential of on demand public transport as a means of
delivering public transport services.
Recommendation:
On demand public transport -
Policy 2.6 supports trials of on demand public transport in different contexts,
for example, to complement existing services, provide a service in areas where
demand may not support a fixed route service, or to meet the needs of specific
customers e.g. people with mobility constraints.
There is an associated action to
develop and implement an on demand trial for Tauranga South. This was
identified as an area where geographical constraints make it difficult to
provide good public transport coverage with existing services. Consequently, a
trial was agreed with partner agencies and included in the Western Bay of
Plenty Transport System Plan programme.
Procurement for this trial is
currently underway. The intention is that this will help establish proof of
concept for wider potential application in the region. Once this trial is
delivered and assessed, we will investigate further options for the application
of on demand public transport, including those raised in the submissions
process.
Expand Opportunity 4 to include
reference to on demand public transport as an option for intra-community
travel.
Add a new ‘Opportunity 8
– New public transport modes’ which references exploring the
potential of on demand public transport alongside other new modes such
passenger rail and ferries.
Expand Service planning and
design action to include reference to exploring the further provision of on
demand public transport services beyond the current trial.
3.1.13 Rapid transit
Many submitters were interested
in the delivery of different modes of rapid transit (bus, rail, light rail,
trams).
Recommendation:
Rapid transit – Policy 4.6
and associated actions support a two-fold approach to rapid transit:
i) progressively deliver a
network of frequent and reliable public transport services with dedicated
priority on the four core UFTI Connected Centres corridors; and
ii) work collaboratively with
UFTI partners and central government to future-proof and secure space on the
Connected Centres corridors in preparation for a longer term transition to a
rapid transit system.
We note there are associated
actions in the RPTP to:
· Undertake
work to better understand what is required to future proof the western Bay of
Plenty sub-region for a potential longer term transition to rapid transit.
· Actively
participate in any central government business cases investigating rapid
transit in the region.
· Investigate
funding and planning mechanisms with the potential to support a longer term
transition to a rapid transit system.
3.1.14 Propulsion technologies
Some submitters suggested
new/different zero emissions propulsion technologies for public transport.
Recommendation:
RPTP actions for mode shift and
carbon reduction include the following:
* Undertake a bus fleet
decarbonisation feasibility study to understand the opportunities and
constraints of increasing the size of the zero emission fleet.
The scope of this study will include
the relative opportunities and constraints of future zero emission propulsion
technologies for the public transport bus fleet. Hydrogen and battery electric
are two potential options. The intent is for the study to establish a future
pathway for transitioning to a zero emission fleet.
3.1.15 Bus stops/shelters
Many submitters raised issues
with bus stops (quality, location, lack of shelter, access).
Recommendation:
Refer
Policies in the draft RPTP seek
to deliver a to deliver a safe, reliable, punctual and high quality customer
experience, and encourage investment in infrastructure (including bus stops) to
support this.
Infrastructure quality –
Policy 3.4 encourages investment in public transport infrastructure that gives
effect to national best practice public transport design guidance.
Your concerns with xxx have been
noted and referred to [the relevant authority] (as the public transport
infrastructure provider) for a response.
Tauranga City [additional note
re: shelters]: We note that investment is programmed in the Tauranga City
Council Long Term Plan to accelerate bus shelter provision across the city.
We also
recommend that the Public Transport Committee makes a recommendation to the
Regional Council to consider investigating potential co-investment
opportunities in public transport infrastructure with the region’s
territorial local authorities (city and district councils).
3.1.16 Safety and security issues
Some submitters raised concerns
about safety at bus stops/interchanges.
Recommendation:
We recognise that safety and
security is fundamental to providing an excellent customer experience. We are
committed to working proactively to ensure the safety and security of users.
Amend Policy 5.2 (Safety and
personal security) to read: ‘Work collaboratively with bus operators and
partner organisations to ensure the safety and security of customers’.
Add the following to
‘Actions – Customer experience and information’: ‘Work
with operators and partner organisations to proactively identify and resolve
public transport safety and security issues’.
We also note the following
‘Customer experience and information’ actions which will support
improved safety and security at bus stops and interchanges:
* Provide security at key
locations on the public transport network where increased risk to safety and
personal security has been identified.
* Implement New Zealand Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design guidelines at public transport
infrastructure and in locations where people access public transport.
3.1.17 School services
One submitter (Whakatane
District Council) did not support the school services policy on the basis that
they should be provided outside the Tauranga urban area.
Recommendation:
We note that the provision of
dedicated school services in Tauranga is a special case and came about as a
consequence of a policy decision by the Ministry of education. Our expectation
is that the Ministry of Education continues to provide dedicated school
services in parts of the region outside the Tauranga urban area and this is
reflected in the policy.
We accept that shifting more
school trips to public transport has many benefits including emissions
reduction, safety and reducing congestion at school drop-off/collection times.
We note that the School Free
Fares Trial has recently been expanded to Whakatane enabling fare free travel
on public transport for school children during school hours. The Regional
Council is certainly willing to work further with Whakatane District Council to
identify ways our public transport services can better serve school based
travel needs in the district.
3.1.18 Ferries
Many submitters were interested
in the provision of a ferry service in the Western Bay of Plenty. Some raised
questions about its viability.
Recommendation:
We note that the RPTP includes a
policy (2.9) and action to undertake a high level business case for a commuter
ferry service in the Western Bay of Plenty. This is likely to build on the
initial analysis undertaken in the Western Bay of Plenty Ferries Feasibility
Study. Many of the points raised are likely to form part of the
assessment of relative costs and benefits. The Regional Council will continue
working collaboratively with partner agencies to explore the feasibility of
implementing a service.
Add a new ‘Opportunity 8
– New public transport modes’ which references investigating the
potential of ferries as a new public transport mode.
3.1.19 Event services
A couple of submissions made
suggestions about services to special events.
Recommendation:
We recognise that public
transport increases accessibility to events and can mitigate the impacts of congestion
caused by the movement of attendees. Services to special events can also
provide wider opportunities for marketing the public transport system and
exposing non-users to the benefits of using public transport.
Add a new Policy 2.11 (Special
events) setting out when the Regional Council will consider providing public
transport support for special events.
Add a new action to
‘Service planning and design’ to develop a set of more
comprehensive criteria for when the Regional Council will provide support for
public transport to special events.
3.1.20 Infrastructure quality/accessibility
Some submitters highlighted the
importance or raised general concerns about the quality of infrastructure that
enabled access to public transport e.g. footpaths, bus stops.
Recommendation:
There are a number of policies
in the RPTP that are designed to ensure consistency in the delivery of an
accessible journey:
Policy 5.1 (Accessible journey)
notes that: ‘the accessible journey covers all the steps needed for a
person to get from their home to their destination and return. All steps in the
accessible journey are interlinked and are of equal importance. If one link is
inadequate, the whole journey may be impossible. Consequently, it focuses on
providing infrastructure and information that:
i. enables easy and safe access
to public transport;
ii. is simple to understand and
use; and
iii. meets best practice quality
and safety standards for stops, shelters, footpaths, crossings, vehicles and
other elements of the accessible journey.
Policy 3.4 (Infrastructure
quality) encourages investment in public transport infrastructure that gives
effect to national best practice public transport design guidance.
We recommend that the Public
Transport Committee makes a recommendation to the Regional Council to consider
investigating potential co-investment opportunities in public transport
infrastructure with the region’s territorial local authorities (city and
district councils).
3.1.21 Accessible buses
Some submitters noted the
importance of accessible buses.
Recommendation:
Policy 3.8 commits the Regional
Council to ensuring that all contracted buses on urban services meet the
relevant national best practice vehicle quality standards. This includes
standards for vehicle accessibility.
3.1.22 Provision for other modes (cycling/micro
mobility)
Some submitters asked for
provision for other modes in the RPTP (e.g. cycling/micro mobility).
Recommendation:
Policy 4.2 (Modal Integration)
supports integration of public transport and other modes (including xxx)
through the provision of appropriate facilities and infrastructure. Setting
more specific objectives for xxx lies outside the scope of a Regional Public
Transport Plan which is primarily concerned with public transport provision (while
recognising the important relationships that exist between public transport,
land use and other modes).
3.1.23 Exploring new innovations/technologies
Some submissions raised
questions about innovation or made suggestions about new technologies that could
be used.
Recommendation:
Policy 3.5 (Innovation and
technology) supports proactively working with partner organisations to improve
our collective capacity to evaluate, and where appropriate, adopt new
innovations and technological improvements as they emerge.
The Regional Council will
continue to work through established regional sector groups to identify,
assess, trial and adopt viable new public transport technologies and
innovations.
3.1.24 Extension of SuperGold concession
A couple of submitters sought
continuation of the current concession beyond the specified trial end date.
Recommendation:
The RPTP is primarily a policy
document, setting the policy framework for the delivery of public transport in
the region. The Regional Council ultimately sets funding levels for public
transport services in its Long Term Plan and Annual Plan processes.
We recommend that the Public
Transport Committee makes a recommendation to the Regional Council to consider
continuing the Extension of SuperGold Concession beyond the current trial end
date on the basis that it is consistent with Policy 7.1 (Fare Principles) in
the Regional Public Transport Plan.
3.1.25 Action/implementation plan
Several submitters raised
questions about the lack of a detailed implementation plan for the RPTP,
setting out timeframes and costs of delivery.
Recommendation:
Accept
Following confirmation of the
policy framework in the RPTP, we are proposing to develop a more detailed
implementation plan for the policies and actions within the Plan. This will
establish costs and timeframes for delivery, while taking into account
available resources.
The Regional Council, through
the Public Transport Committee, will continue to be the champion for public
transport in the region, and we look forward to continuing the collaborative
approach with partner agencies when developing this plan.
Amend Part 5: to clarify intent
to develop a more detailed implementation plan for the RPTP.
3.1.26 Bus service changes
Many submitters suggested or
requested changes to specific bus services (routes, frequencies, operating
times/days).
Recommendation:
The submission has been noted
and referred to the BOPRC public transport network planning team for
consideration in the next service review [add context specific information on
next scheduled service review e.g. Tauranga Bus Network Refresh (Stage 2)
– Tauranga Western].
For Tauranga/Western Bay of
Plenty also note:
The Western Bay of Plenty Public
Transport Services and Infrastructure Business Case is currently modelling
different options for the Tauranga and the Western Bay of Plenty to determine
the best service operating model for the sub-region (routes, frequencies,
interchange points and supporting infrastructure). Customer focus is at the
heart of this business case.
4. Recommended changes to the Plan
The recommended changes to the
RPTP in response to submissions are shown in track changes in the attached
Plan. These are summarised below.
Inside
cover
· Revised
vision statement moved to front of document.
· Accompanied
by a new statement of network aspirations and what the Plan will deliver: Connecting
the Bay! More Access, Less Carbon.
Glossary
· Definition
of ‘mode shift’ added.
Foreword
· Updated to
note dynamic operating environment; the need for flexibility/agility;
additional comment on Tauranga city congestion, mode shift and emissions; and
to reflect the final Plan.
1.2.3
Reviewing the RPTP
· Revised to
note:
o The highly dynamic and
constantly changing operating environment.
o The need for public transport
agencies to be flexible and nimble in response.
o Implications of the New
Zealand Emissions Reduction Plan.
o Implications of the
Sustainable Public Transport Framework.
· Wording
updated to reflect final Plan.
1.3
Developing this RPTP
· Updated with
summary of public consultation.
· Statement
added that the Regional Council will champion public transport in the region.
2.1.1 Relationship between plans
· Figure 2
revised to clarify He Mauri Ohooho is the region’s Maori Economic
Development Strategy; include reference to the New Zealand Emissions Reduction
Plan.
2.1.3
Bay of Plenty Regional Land Transport Plan 2021-2031
· Footnote
added noting RLTP emissions reduction target is subject to review following
release of New Zealand Emissions Reduction Plan.
2.2
Funding
· Updated with
forecast public transport funding and $ amounts.
· Statement
added noting gap between current funding levels and future investment that is
likely to be required. Linked to new Challenge 4: Funding our network.
2.3.1
Regional context for challenges and opportunities
· Updated with
patronage figures to end of June 2022.
2.3.3
Challenge 2 – Meeting the access needs of smaller urban centres and...
· Added
‘reliable’ to the description.
2.3.4 Challenge 3 - Climate change and reducing emissions
· Added pie
charts of Tauranga city and Rotorua district greenhouse gas emissions.
· Added
footnote noting the sources of transport emissions that are included in
calculations and that emissions from international shipping are excluded.
2.3.4
Challenge 4 – Funding our network
· Added
new challenge recognising that local authorities will not be able to fund the
public transport services and infrastructure required to achieve ambitious new
targets by themselves; a step change in central government funding will be
required.
· Note revised
to state that local authorities are working with urgency to better understand
the implications of new targets in the national Emissions Reduction Plan; and
that a variation to the RPTP will be required once this work is completed.
2.3.6
Opportunity 1 – Transforming our urban public transport networks...
· Modified
reference to read ‘main urban public transport networks’.
2.3.8 Opportunity 3 - Delivering interventions to create a
competitive...
· Modified
reference to read ‘main urban centres’.
· Added
reference to road pricing as a potential future intervention.
2.3.9
Opportunity 4 - Exploring new public transport delivery
models...
· Expanded to include
reference to intra-community travel in urban areas.
2.3.13
Opportunity 8 – New public transport modes
· Added a new
opportunity on investigating the potential for new public transport modes
including: passenger rail (both intra and inter-regional), ferries and on
demand public transport.
2.4.3 Rotorua
· Updated to
note current service will soon be replaced by a new network.
2.5.1 Bee Card
· Reference to
strategy for integrated national system added.
2.5.3 Summary
of recent developments
· Table
updated to note Regional Tertiary/Commuter Services Trial has been extended to
December 2023.
3.1
Vision
· Vision
statement revised to include reference to ‘convenient, accessible public
transport and ‘regional connectivity’.
3.2
Objectives
· Note revised
to state that local authorities are working with urgency to better understand
the implications of new targets in the national Emissions Reduction Plan; and
that a variation to the RPTP will be required once this work is completed.
· References
added footnotes to clarify source of information for targets where baselines
have been noted.
3.2.1 Objective 1: Mode shift and carbon reduction
· Target
replaced with aspirational target to ‘plan and deliver a network to
achieve 20% public transport mode share in the region’s main urban areas
by 2032’.
3.2.2
Objective 2: Service planning and design
· ‘Easy
to use’ replaced by ‘convenient’.
· The word ‘all’
added to objective statement to increase the emphasis on inclusive and equality
of access to public transport for all.
3.2.2 Objective 3: Service
and infrastructure delivery
· ‘High
quality’ replaced by ‘convenient’.
3.3 Focus areas
· Customer
centred – ‘competitive’ replaced by
‘convenient’
· Accessibility
– reference to ‘exploring new modes and delivery models’
added.
4.1.1 Tauranga and the Western Bay of Plenty
· Summary
– references to bus decarbonisation feasibility study and exploring new
modes and delivery models added (rail, ferries, on demand public transport).
· New Figure
15 added showing relationship between western Bay of Plenty strategic transport
planning documents.
· Figure 16
(Map) updated with latest proposed intensification on Te Papa peninsula.
4.1.2 Rotorua
· Summary
updated to provide consistent reference to exploring new modes and delivery
models.
· Updated with
patronage figures to end of June 2022.
· Section
updated with reference to final recommended network for Rotorua.
4.1.3 Eastern
Bay of Plenty
· Updated
Eastern Bay of Plenty summary to clarify distinction between shorter and
longer term strategy.
· Updated with
patronage figures to end of June 2022.
4.1.4 Regional services
· Replaced
reference to ‘grant’ with ‘funding contribution’.
· Added
reference to intra-regional travel for medical and health services.
· Replaced
‘fast’ with ‘convenient’.
Policy 1.3 Travel demand management
· Amended to
refer to programmes rather than strategies, and development in partnership with
territorial authorities.
Policy 1.4 Zero emission public transport
· Added
reference to different service options including smaller zero emission vehicles
and on demand public transport.
Policy
1.6 Passenger rail
· Included
additional policy provisions to be consistent Waikato region policy and to
protect existing rail corridors.
Policy
1.7 Transport pricing
· Replaced
‘advocate for’ with ‘support’.
Actions
– mode shift and carbon reduction
· Additional
action to ‘work with urgency to better understand what is required to
achieve new national vehicle kilometres travelled targets and to plan for 20%
public transport mode share by 2032.’
4.2.2
Service planning and design
· Objective 2
– replaced ‘easy to use’ with ‘convenient’.
Policy
2.1 Service planning principles
· New policy
principle to support sustainable service provision and retention of a stable
and sustainable workforce.
Policy 2.5 Community
services
· Policy
wording revised to provide further definition of intent.
Policy 2.8 School services
· Textbox
updated to clarify that Ministry of Education provides services to those parts
of the region outside the Tauranga urban area.
Policy 2.10 Regional
services
· New policy added
to design and implement a regional services network that provides a convenient
and attractive service to customers.
Policy 2.11 Special events
· New policy
added setting out when the Regional Council will consider providing public
transport support for special events.
Actions – Service planning and design
· Expand
existing action to explore the further provision of on demand public transport
service beyond the current trial for Tauranga South.
· New actions
to:
o prepare and implement a
regional bus services strategy; and
o develop
criteria for when the Regional Council will support for public transport to
special events.
4.2.3 Service and infrastructure delivery
· Objective 3
– replace ‘high quality’ with ‘convenient’.
Actions – Service and infrastructure delivery
· Two actions
added:
o Undertake a technical review
of contract units to ensure they provide an optimal mix of unit sizes and
operators in the region to deliver high quality services.
o Work with operators to ensure
that there are sufficient drivers to deliver contracted levels of service.
Policy 4.4 Infrastructure
timing
· Policy expanded
to cover protecting public transport corridors and ensuring sufficient width
and space is provided.
Actions – Public transport and land use integration
· Added action
to:
o Review the provision of public
transport services and infrastructure against areas in the region identified
for medium and high density residential living under the Resource Management
Act – Enabling Housing Supply Amendment Act by August 2023.
Policy 5.2 Safety and personal security
· Policy
revised to focus on ensuring the safety and security of customers.
Actions
– Customer experience and information
· New action
to work with operators and partner organisations to proactively identify and
resolve public transport safety and security issues.
Part
5: Implementation, monitoring and review
· Part 5
updated to include reference to the development of an implementation plan for
the policies and actions in the RPTP, which will establish costs and timeframes
for delivery, while taking into account available resources.
5.3
Performance measures
· Updated to
include mode share (including its contribution to carbon reduction), vehicle
kilometres travelled (vkt), and benchmarking with other regions.
Appendix
A: Policy Context
· Updated to
provide the latest information on the Sustainable Public Transport Framework
(replacing the Public Transport Operating Model).
· Updated to
include reference to the following central government documents:
o Hīkina te Kohupara
– Kia mauri ora ai te iwi Transport Emissions: Pathways to Net Zero by
2050
o Ināia tonu nei: a low
emissions future for Aotearoa
o Toitū Te Taiao - Our
Sustainability Action Plan
5. Considerations
5.1 Risks and Mitigations
The following table shows
potential risks and mitigations that have been identified and actively managed
during the review process.
|
Risk
|
Mitigations
|
|
Confusion about the role
of the RPTP review project and how it relates to all the other ‘public
transport initiatives’.
|
· Identify
and describe key dependencies.
· Early
communication with key stakeholders on scope of RPTP review, relationship
with other initiatives.
|
|
Some sectors of the
community unhappy with the policies in the RPTP as the review progresses and
concludes.
|
· Early
engagement with community on RPTP review.
· Clear
communication on the benefits of implementing the policies.
|
|
Unable to achieve key
stakeholder buy-in.
|
· Early
communication with key stakeholders on scope of RPTP review, relationship
with other initiatives.
· Establish
and maintain a multi-agency project team.
|
|
Project team unable to
complete work due to other commitments / conflicting demands on their time.
|
· Champion
project as a priority in the Regional Council work programme.
· Active
project management approach to maintain momentum.
|
|
Policy positions
required in key areas and topics to inform other work ahead of RPTP timing.
|
· Adopt an
adaptive, flexible approach to developing the policy positions.
· Focus on
‘doing the thinking’ to support multiple public transport-related
projects and programmes.
|
|
Rapid and fundamental
shift in assumptions underpinning the Plan - economic trends, travel
behaviour, transport costs and revenues, technological change, catastrophic
event (e.g. pandemic, natural disaster).
|
· Horizon
scanning.
· Continue
to develop an understanding of the local level impacts of COVID-19 on public
transport.
|
|
Services identified as
being integral to the public transport network are not operated as planned
due to external factors e.g. driver shortages, major road works, traffic
congestion and a lack of public transport priority, thus undermining public
confidence in the system.
|
· Continue
to work with operators and partner agencies on an integrated approach to the
provision of public transport services and infrastructure.
· Joint
development and implementation of management plans for parts of the public
transport network subject to significant disruption.
|
5.2 Climate Change
Public
transport contributes to reduced GHG emissions because many people in one
vehicle produce less emissions than the same number of people in several cars.
GHG emissions are reduced further when the public transport trip is in a zero
emission vehicle.
The Government
has announced its plans to decarbonise the public transport bus fleet. The
Government’s commitment is to:
· require only zero-emission public transport buses to be purchased by
2025; and
· target the decarbonisation of the public transport bus fleet by
2035.
The Regional
Council is undertaking a bus fleet decarbonisation feasibility study to
understand the opportunities and constraints of increasing the size of the
zero-emission fleet as bus service contracts are renewed and achieving a fully
emissions free public transport bus fleet by 2035.
The recommended
RPTP features a significant focus on climate change and emissions reduction.
5.3 Implications for Māori
Public transport has positive
effects for Māori through improved accessibility and choice of transport
options. This enables Māori to have better access to essential services
and opportunities, including employment, education and health care both within
major urban centres and between smaller settlements and larger centres.
The project team includes
Māori Policy expertise, and engaging with Māori has been an
important part of the consultation process. The recommended RPTP features
policies and actions that support partnerships with Māori and the
potential for co-designing solutions that better meet their access needs.
5.4 Community Engagement
|
|
CONSULT
Whakauiuia
|
To obtain input or feedback from affected communities
about our analysis, alternatives, and /or proposed decisions.
|
Public
consultation took place between 4 – 29 July 2022. The consultation
process was consistent with s82 of the Local Government Act, and
consultation requirements under the Land Transport Management Act 2003 (LTMA).
5.5 Financial Implications
If the recommendation is adopted by Council, will it result in:
- Unbudgeted work during the current financial
year?
- Unbudgeted work for any of the years remaining
in the current Long Term Plan?
If the answer is ‘no’ to both questions please
select the dropdown option 1 and complete appropriately.
If the answer is ‘yes’ to either question please
select “Budget Implications” in the building block below and liaise
with your Management Accountant in order to complete the Financial Impact
table.
There are no
material unbudgeted financial implications and this fits within the allocated
budget.
Development or review of the
RPTP must take into account the public transport funding likely to be available
in the region and this has shaped the strategic direction in the Plan,
including the challenge of funding our network.
6. Next Steps
Next Steps: What next? What resources are needed? Further
analysis? Timeframes ahead. Any consultation planned. Remind Council of the
process ahead. Next update to Council?
Conclusion: Short concluding remarks. Referring back to
recommendations. No new content.
6.1 Adoption
Adoption of the RPTP is a two-step process:
· This report
seeks the Public Transport Committee’s endorsement of the RPTP as
recommended by the RPTP Hearings Subcommittee, and a recommendation to the
Regional Council to the adopt the RPTP.
· The Regional
Council will then make a decision on adopting the final RPTP at its meeting on
29 September.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Bay of Plenty Regional Public Transport Plan
2022-2032 ⇩
