Agenda of Rangitāiki River Forum - Friday, 4 December 2020

Rangitāiki River Forum

Membership

Chairperson	Maramena Vercoe (Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa)
Deputy Chairperson	Te Waiti Rangiwai (Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare)
Tangata Whenua Member
One appointed representative each:
Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa	Karito Paul (Alternate)
Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare	Jose Miki (Alternate)
Ngāti Tūwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Settlement Trust	Clifford Te Riini Paora Hunia (Alternate)
Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa	Miro Araroa Tuwhakairiora O'Brien (Alternate)
Hineuru Iwi Trust	Ivy Kahukiwa Smith
Tūhoe Te Uru Taumatua	Ngapera Rangiaho
Te Kotahitanga o Ngāti Tūwharetoa	Whakaeke Ritete Ngatoru Wall (Alternate)
Council Members
One appointed members each:
Whakatāne District Council	Cr Alison Silcock Cr Wilson James (Alternate)
Taupō District Council	Cr Kylie Leonard Cr Anna Park (Alternate)
Up to five appointed members:
Bay of Plenty Regional Council	Cr Bill Clark Cr Toi Kai Rākau Iti Cr Stacey Rose Cr Kevin Winters
Quorum	Three iwi members and three Council members and must include a Ngāti Whare member and a Ngāti Manawa member.
Meeting frequency	Quarterly

Other iwi and local authorities through consensus of the Forum, may join the Forum.

Purpose

The purpose of the Forum as set out in Ngāti Manawa Claims Settlement Act 2012 and the Ngāti Whare Claims Settlement Act 2012 is the the protection and enhancement of the environmental, cultural, and spiritual health and wellbeing of the Rangitāiki River and its resources, for the benefit of present and future generations.

Rangitāiki River Forum’s scope covers the geographical area of the Rangitāiki River Catchment including the Rangitāiki River’ Whirinaki River, Wheao River and Horomanga River as shown on deed plan OTS-095-024.

This is a permanent joint committee under the Local Government Act 2002 and co-governance partnership between local authorities and iwi that share an interest in the Rangitāiki River and must not be discharged unless all of the appointing organisations agree to the discharge.

Role

· Prepare and approve the Rangitāiki River Document for eventual recognition by the Regional Policy Statement, Regional Plans and District Plans. See Figure 1 Rangitāiki River Document Recognition Process for RPS.

· Promote the integrated and coordinated management of the Rangitāiki River.

· Engage with and provide advice to:

§ Local Authorities on statutory and non-statutory processes that affect the Rangitāiki River, including under the Resource Management Act 1991.

§ Crown agencies that exercise functions in relation to the Rangitāiki River.

· Monitor the extent to which the purpose of the Rangitāiki River Forum is being achieved including the implementation and effectiveness of the Rangitāiki River Document.

· Gather information, disseminate information and hold meetings

· Take any other action that is related to achieving the purpose of the Forum.

Ngāti Whare Deed of Settlement

5.49 The Crown and Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare acknowledge and agree that:

5.49.1 the parties are yet to finalise discussions in relation to a framework for the effective participation of Ngāti Whare in the management of the Rangitāiki River;

5.49.2 following the signing of this Deed the parties will continue to discuss a framework that provides for the effective participation of Ngāti Whare in the management of the Rangitāiki River (“Rangitāiki River management framework”), with the objective of improving the health and wellbeing and sustainable use of the river;

5.49.3 the discussions in relation to the Rangitāiki River management framework will:

a. be undertaken in good faith, honour and integrity and will reflect the wider commitments set out in the Deed of Settlement;

b. be undertaken in accordance with an agreed programme for further engagement and completed by the date of the introduction of the Settlement Legislation;

c. where appropriate, reflect a catchment wide and integrated approach to management of the Rangitāiki River and its resources;

d. reflect the need to recognise and provide for the interests of other iwi, local authorities, and other entities with interests or statutory roles in relation to the Rangitāiki River;

e. develop a programme for engagement with other iwi, local authorities, and other entities with interests or statutory roles in relation to the Rangitāiki River; and

f. allow for the Rangitāiki River management framework to be incorporated in the Settlement Legislation as necessary either at the time of introduction to Parliament or by way of a Supplementary Order Paper.

5.49.4 the discussions will be based on:

a. Ngāti Whare’s principles, to be agreed with the Crown, regarding the Rangitāiki River;

b. as appropriate, the principles of other iwi with interests in relation to the Rangitāiki River as agreed with the Crown;

c. the need to protect the integrity of existing statutory frameworks; and

d. the need to ensure consistency and fairness between settlements.

Ngāti Manawa Deed of Settlement

5.40 The Crown and Ngāti Manawa acknowledge and agree that:

5.40.1 the parties are yet to finalise the redress for the effective participation of Ngāti Manawa in the management of the Rangitāiki River;

5.40.2 following the signing of this deed the parties will continue to discuss a framework that provides for the effective participation of Ngāti Manawa in the management of the Rangitāiki River (the “Rangitāiki River management framework”), with the objective of improving the health and best use of the river;

5.40.3 the discussions will be based on:

a. Ngāti Manawa’s principles regarding the Rangitāiki River as set out in clause 5.41;

b. the need to protect the integrity of existing statutory frameworks; and

c. the need to ensure consistency and fairness between settlements;

5.40.4 the discussions will:

a. be undertaken in good faith, honour and integrity and will reflect the commitments set out in the deed of settlement;

b. be undertaken in accordance with an agreed programme for further engagement and completed by the date of the introduction of the settlement legislation;

c. reflect the need to recognise and provide for the interests of other iwi, local authorities, and other entities with interests or statutory roles in relation to the Rangitāiki River;

d. develop a programme for engagement with other iwi, local authorities, and other entities with interests or statutory roles in relation to the Rangitāiki River; and

e. allow for the Rangitāiki River management framework to be incorporated in the settlement legislation as necessary either at the time of introduction to Parliament or by way of a Supplementary Order Paper.

Decision Making

The Forum must make its decisions by a vote at a meeting and must seek to achieve consensus, be consistent with and reflect the purpose of the Forum and acknowledge the interests of iwi in particular parts of the Rangitāiki and its catchments.

Power to Act

The Forum has the discretion to determine in any particular circumstance whether to exercise any function identified and to what extent any function identified is exercised.

Power to Recommend

To the partner organisations on any matters within the Forum’s delegated role as it deems appropriate.

Rangitāiki River Forum members report directly to their respective organisations.

Rangitāiki River Forum Minutes

4 September 2020

Rangitāiki River Forum

Ngā Meneti

Open Minutes

Commencing: Friday 4 September 2020, 10.30 am

Venue: Via Zoom (Audio Visual Meeting)

Heamana

Chairperson: Maramena Vercoe - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa

Heamana Tuarua

Deputy Chairperson: Te Waiti Rangiwai - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare

Ngā Kopounga

Members: Miro Araroa – Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa

Cr Bill Clark – Bay of Plenty Regional Council

Cr Toi Kai Rākau Iti – Bay of Plenty Regional Council

Cr Stacey Rose – Bay of Plenty Regional Council

Whakaeke Ritete – Te Kotahitanga o Ngāti Tūwharetoa

Cr Wilson James (Alternate) – Whakatāne District Council

Karito Paul (Alternate) - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa

Cr Alison Silcock – Whakatāne District Council

Ngapera Rangiaho – Tūhoe Te Uru Taumatua

Clifford Te Riini – Ngāti Tūwharetoa (Bay of Plenty) Settlement Trust

Te Hunga i Tae Ake

In Attendance: Bay of Plenty Regional Council: Chris Ingle – General Manager Integrated Catchments, Mieke Kapa – Land Management Officer (Eastern), Andrew Pawson – Area Engineer, Peter Ellery (Contractor), Charles Harley – Team Leader Eastern Catchments, Bruce Crabbe – Rivers & Drainage Operations Manager, Shari Kameta – Committee Advisor, Hemi Barsdell – Asset Management Specialist, Anaru Vercoe – Strategic Engagement Manager, Jo Watts – Acting Water Policy Team Leader, Micah Butt – Senior Māori Resource Management Advisor, Gina Mohi – Pūtaiao Matauranga, Sanjana France – Communications Partners, Sandy Hohepa – Māori Policy Advisor, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa: Maxeen Newton – Pou Taiao, Whakatāne District Council: Nicholas Woodley – Manager Project Development and Delivery, Taupō District Council: Sue Mavor – Strategic Advisor Māori

Presenters/Externals: Place Group: Michelle Archer – Project Manager, Morag McKenzie – Director, Waikakariki Limited: Clifford Merriman, Ismael Mitai; Southern Generation Partnership Limited: Peter Mulvihill – General Manager Project Development and Delivery, NIWA: Siobhan Nuri – MSc Student, Trustpower: Ryan Piddington, Jen Spence, Nicola Foran, Lisa Mead

Ngā Hōnea

Apologies: Tuwhakairiora O'Brien (Alternate) - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa

Cr Kylie Leonard – Taupō District Council

Whakaeke Ritete (lateness)

Cr Stacey Rose (lateness/early departure 2pm)

Te Waiti Rangiwai (early departure 1pm)

Ngapera Rangiaho (early departure 2pm)
Ivy Kahukiwa Smith – Hineuru Iwi Trust

Cr Kevin Winters – Bay of Plenty Regional Council

1. Karakia Whakatuwhera
Opening Karakia

A karakia was provided by Miro Araroa, which Clifford Te Riini responded with a mihi.

2. Opening Announcement

Recording of the Meeting

Forum Chair Maramena Vercoe raised concerns that had been expressed by Iwi members regarding audio and visual recording of the meeting for public viewing. Key concerns raised were: members comments could be sensitive and/or taken out of context and misinterpreted, members wanted a safe environment to express their views without public scrutiny, recording the meeting placed pressure on members and could pose a risk to their mana. Consideration was raised to provide appropriate training for Iwi members on the potential implications of recorded meetings, managing outcomes and professional conduct in preparation for the recording of meetings in the future.

Motion

Resolved

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Agrees that the meeting not be recorded for the reasons provided.

Vercoe/Rangiwai

CARRIED

10:50 am – Cr Stacey Rose entered the meeting.

3. Ngā Hōnea
Apologies

Resolved

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Accepts the apologies from: Tuwhakairiora O'Brien, Cr Kylie Leonard, Ivy Kahukiwa Smith, Cr Kevin Winters, Whakaeke Ritete (for lateness), Cr Stacey Rose (early departure 2pm), Te Waiti Rangiwai (early departure 1pm) and Ngapera Rangiaho (early departure 2pm) tendered at the meeting.

Rangiwai/Rangiaho

CARRIED

4. Raupapa o Ngā Take
Order of Business

It was noted that Agenda Item 10.1, ‘Forum Membership Appointment’ would be considered after Agenda Item 9.1, ‘Proposed Walkway around Lake Aniwaniwa’ due to the early departure of the Deputy Chair/member for Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare.

5. Whakapuakanga o Ngā Take Whai Taha-Rua
Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

6. Ngā Meneti
Minutes

Ngā Meneti a Ngā Komiti
Minutes to be Confirmed

6.1

Rangitaiki River Forum Minutes - 5 June 2020

Resolved

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Confirms the Rangitaiki River Forum Minutes - 5 June 2020 as a true and correct record.

Rose/Rangiwai

CARRIED

7. Whakahoutanga Kōrero
Verbal Updates

7.1

Forum Members Verbal Updates

Te Waiti Rangiwai

· Reactivation of Covid-19 Level 2 on 12 August had resulted in office closure for Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare, however staff were continuing to respond to public enquiries.

· The Rūnanga had developed a Covid-19 Pandemic Response Plan to help with managing future mahi, and had called on many relationships over the past three months to assist with key kaupapa.

Clifford Te Riini

· Work and discussions were ongoing with iwi partners Ngāti Awa and Ngāti Rangitihi on geothermal discharges into the Tarawera River.

· Future focus regarding the Rangitāiki catchment would be consideration of the Matahina and Aniwhenua Dam resource consent renewals.

Ngapera Rangiaho

· Hapū engagement was occurring with the Aniwhenua Dam regarding the proposal for sedimentation extraction.

· Waiohau hapū/community were developing an emergency response plan in alignment with the Galatea community and Aniwhenua Dam plans.

· Waiohau hapū were keeping in mind the resource consent renewal process that was scheduled in 2026 for Aniwaniwa dam.

· Waiohau hapū had received a presentation from Cr Silcock and the Galatea Community Group on the proposed walkway for Lake Aniwaniwa, which had been well received. Engagement with the project would be ongoing as a key interest.

Cr Bill Clark

· Further to the Forum meeting of 5 June 2020, Cr Clark and member Tuwhakairiora O'Brien had reviewed Department of Conservation’s whitebait regulations on the behalf of the Forum. From a Ngāti Awa perspective, Mr O’Brien was not comfortable with the proposal and would provide an update at the next Forum meeting.

· Rangitāiki-Tarawera River Advisory Group had appointed two new members: Heyden Johnston (an active member of the Thornton community and son of the late George Johnston) and Leeann Waka (Rangitāiki Community Board representative).

Cr Toi Iti

· An issue had been raised by Mr Pem Bird regarding low groundwater issues at Murupara, which Cr Iti had advised Mr Bird to refer the matter to the Forum Chair and Regional Council staff where appropriate.

Cr Stacey Rose

· No update to report.

Miro Araroa

· Discussions were ongoing with Ngāti Tūwharetoa (BOP) Settlement Trust on geothermal discharges into the Tarawera River.

· Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa and affected hapū were in discussions to agree on a way forward in regard to Fonterra consent.

· Ngāti Awa would be holding annual discussions with Trustpower in regard to environmental flows and impacts on the awa in relation to their consent.

· Local iwi/hapū members had been actively involved with NIWA’s glass eel sampling on the Rangitāiki awa.

Cr Alison Silcock

· Cr Silcock and Ngapera Rangiaho had been working closely on matters relating to the Galatea/Waiohau communities and had met with Aniwhenua Dam owners to look at their emergency response plan.

· Informal engagement and information sharing had commenced with Lake Aniwaniwa landowners on the walkway proposal.

Maramena Vercoe

· Te Rūnanga on Ngāti Manawa had appointed Maxeen Newton to a new Pou Taiao position.

· Manawa Tu Work for Life Centre would open on 16 September 2020. Forum members were invited to attend the opening.

· Over 100 people had registered for work, which had revealed the need for additional resources to support those entering the workforce.

· Members of the community still required support from the impacts of Covid-19, requiring quick and effective coordination of resources.

7.2

Rangitaiki River Forum Covid-19 Contingency Plan

Presented by: Te Waiti Rangiwai, Forum Deputy Chair

Key Points:

· Raised for the Forum’s consideration, developing a Covid-19 Pandemic Response Plan to cover matters of relevance, such as: how meetings should be managed, ensuring attendance of members at hui, and keeping people safe.

· A Response Plan would ensure that Rangitāiki River Forum whānau had a plan that was meaningful and relevant, which could be referred to when the need arose.

Item for Follow Up:

The Chair noted the matter for consideration at the next Forum meeting.

11:16 am – Whakaeke Ritete entered the meeting.

8. Whakaaturanga
Presentations

8.1

Proposed Walkway around Lake Aniwaniwa

Presentation: Lake Aniwaniwa Galataea Walking/Cycling Facility - Information Sharing: Objective ID A3614265

Presented by: Cr Alison Silcock

Key Points:

· The proposed walkway was a project led by the Galatea Community Group for a 11km dual purpose walking/cycling facility around Lake Aniwaniwa, as a recreational resource for the local community and potential visitors.

· The project had been in the pipeline for a number of years, but was put on hold while attention was given to the flooding impacts on farmers.

· Long-term goal was to join with other trails, such as the Ngāti Manawa planned trail, Whirinaki Trails, Tūhoe foothills track and other trails in the lower Eastern Bay of Plenty.

· A map illustrated the starting point and project phases.

· The project was supported by Southern Generation, Whakatāne District Council and the Regional Council with funding provided for an initial design concept plan. Further financial contributions would need to be acquired.

· Highlighted the benefits the walkway would provide to the community to: celebrate the cultural importance of the river and area, improve water quality and aesthetics with native planting, recreational/mobility access and educational, tourism and local employment opportunities.

· Envisaged the involvement of local volunteers, community and contractors.

· Galatea Community Group was discussing the proposal with landowners.

· Welcomed any feedback from the Forum and could provide updates at key project stages.

In response to Questions:

· Galatea Community Group was in the early stages of information sharing and had not as yet met with the wider community to discuss the proposal, but had made initial contact with landowners and Southern Generation.

· Had plans to arrange a meeting with Te Uru Taumatua to inform them of the project and seek feedback.

· Would explore funding opportunities and seek the support and advice of Whakatane District Council and the Regional Council on potential avenues.

· Iwi would be consulted in regard to wāhi tapu and archaeological sites to ensure they were provided for and protected.

Key Points - Members:

· The project would be a great benefit to the community.

· Karito Paul expressed his interest to be involved in the project.

· Chair Maramena Vercoe and Deputy Chair Te Waiti Rangiwai welcomed the opportunity for Ngāti Manawa and Ngāti Whare to be involved, noting particular regard to the Green Job fund and cultural aspects of the project.

· Noted for consideration the Ministry for the Environment Jobs for Nature and Provincial Growth Fund as potential funding avenues.

9. Ngā Pūrongo
Reports

Ngā Whakatau e Hiahiatia Ana
Decisions Required

9.1

Forum Membership Appointment

Key Points - Members:

· The Chair and members welcomed Karito Paul to the Forum.

· Mr Paul responded noting it was a privilege to be appointed onto the Forum.

Resolved

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Receives the report, Forum Membership Appointment.

2 Confirms the appointment of Karito Paul onto the Rangitāiki River Forum as the alternate member for Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa.

Rangiaho/Rangiwai

CARRIED

10. Whakaaturanga
Presentations (Continued)

10.1	Renewal of Non-Scheme Waterway Management Consent Presentation: Resource Consent 64684 - A consent to enable repair works in streams and waterways in the Bay of Plenty: Objective ID A3622584 Presented by: Hemi Barsdell, Rivers and Drainage Asset Management Specialist
	Key Points: · Renewal of consent 64684 was currently at the pre-notification stage and anticipated to be notified for public submissions later this year. · The consent would apply to all waterways, but would exclude all rivers and drainage maintenance scheme areas (permitted activities under the Regional Natural Resources Plan), and Whirinaki Te Pua-a-Tāne Conservation Park and Te Urewera within the Rangitāiki catchment. · The consent would primarily be used when Council was approached by landowners and enabled Council to provide for its statutory functions of providing advice around soil conservation, water quality management and natural hazard mitigation. · Work completed under the consent may include: removal of vegetation and sediment build-up, bank erosion repairs, removal of small-scale debris and enhancement work to improve ecosystem habitat. · For each work project under the consent, a specific management plan will be prepared prior to work occurring. · In response to feedback received from tangata whenua, staff had included proposed conditions within the consent application form to provide for engagement, particularly with tangata whenua. · Staff had been engaging with tangata whenua since February 2020 to inform and seek feedback on the consent renewal process. · Engagement undertaken to date had included Forum iwi partners, with the exception of Hineuru which staff were following up. · The consent was wide-reaching and related to waterways, therefore staff were keen to engage with Iwi/tangata whenua on the process, and welcomed feedback from any groups that would like to be engaged. In Response to Questions: · Common engagement themes with tangata whenua had focused on: water quality, wāhi tapu, planting of native species to support habitat improvement, and ensuring tangata whenua were consulted where relevant and appropriate. · The consent could be used to align with Te Ara Whānui outcomes to improve water quality and enhance habitat. · Considered some low cost/low impact improvements could be made to Council’s Environmental Code of Practice (COP) for Rivers and Drainage Maintenance Activities to better achieve some Te Ara Whānui outcomes. · Cost of consent in most instances would fall to the applicant (landowner), with up to a 25% maximum contribution from Council in recognition of its statutory functions. Key Points - Members: · Signalled an expectation for Te Ara Whānui goals and objectives to be front of mind in Council mahi, including finding solutions to improve and achieve the naturalness of the Rangitāiki River and its tributaries. · Sought consideration for Iwi to be involved when reviewing Council’s Environmental COP.
	Items for Staff Follow Up: · Deputy Chair Te Waiti Rangiwai requested a copy of the proposed consent application form for information.
10.2	Creating fish nursery and rearing habitat on river margins Presentation: Creating fish nursery and rearing habitat on river margins: Objective ID A3615366 Presented by: Mieke Kapa, Land Management Officer (Eastern), Peter Ellery (Contractor) and Andrew Pawson, Area Engineer (Rivers and Drainage)
	Key Points: · The document ‘Creating fish nursery and rearing habitat on river margins’ (refer page 23 of the agenda) was primarily targeted as in-house guidance for staff and had since been shared with other regional councils. · Creation of fish habitat was most effective during stopbank maintenance. · Provided examples of design styles and pond construction created at Te Huauri o Te Kawa (Kaituna), Ōkorero (Thornton Lagoon), Ferry Road (Whakatāne) and on a farm within the Rangitāiki catchment. · A potential new site was being investigated on Regional Council land along the Horomanga Stream margin, with potential opportunity for involvement from Galatea School and the local caregroup. · Peter Ellery’s extensive experience of habitat creation had contributed significantly to the development of the guidance document. · Mr Pawson gave an overview of river maintenance and soft engineering solutions that were being used on the Rangitāiki awa. · Regeneration and layering of willows provided habitat for invertebrate, native fish species, bird life, as well as softening of the water currents. · The use of rip-rap rock was avoided where possible, but still needed to be used for further stability particularly where velocity flows were high. In Response to Questions: · The use of willow was carefully considered in terms of having the right tree in the right place and were used because of their speed of growth and bank stabilisation properties. · Shrub willows were used for riverbank works which are less invasive and more manageable than crack willow or grey willow. · Layered willows were still hinged to the stump, where trench willows were tied down. Trench willows handled levels of flooding more, but could still give way where there was a total loss of bank stabilisation. · Planting of natives behind rip-rap was taking place, which provided some habitat for native fish and aquatic species. · Eel and fish habitat was apparent along rock rip rap river banks, contrary to popular belief, and having a sloping rip rap bank was considered better for fish and eel habitat than a vertical soil bank. Key Points - Members: Commended Mr Ellery and staff for their work and looked forward to further positive outcomes along the Rangitāiki awa.

10.3

Rangitāiki River Wetlands project update

Presentation: Rangitaiki Wetlands Project Update: Objective ID A3615232

Presented by: Michelle Archer and Morag McKenzie (Place Group), Ismael Mitai and Clifford Merriman (Waikakariki Ltd)

Key Points:

· Rangitāiki Wetland Restoration Project was a 5-year project (2018-2023) co-funded by the Ministry for the Environment’s Freshwater Improvement Fund and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

· Approval had been obtained from the landowners of the three wetlands: Hinengawiri, Karamuramu and Rangipo.

· Objectives were to: improve indigenous biodiversity of wetlands, reduce pest plants and animals, and build capacity and capability within the local community.

· Provided an overview of each wetland and progress made on: completion of baseline data/monitoring, groundwork for safe access, initial weed control, and completion of planting at one site.

· Project highlights were: first year of work completed to high standard, first planting undertaken by local kuia on 16 June, the project was collaborating and working well with landowners and local contractors, local capacity and capability had increased, and were contributing to the local economy.

· Mr Mitai and Mr Merriman provided background on Waikakariki Limited:

o Contracting company established in 2018 and locally based in Murupara.

o Goal was to create a sustainable community for their whenua and iwi.

o Engaged by the project in June 2019 and involved in all three wetlands.

o Highlights thus far were: employed seven local rangatahi, gained a greater understanding of the natural environment, involved with other services in the community, and created good relationships with local kura and kohanga reo.

o Future goals were to: continue the journey forward, create a sustainable community, create support pathways for local rangatahi and community, form a Rangitāiki River pest management group, and support and work with iwi/Rūnanga.

o Acknowledged Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa in working towards the restoration of the whenua.

Key Points - Members:

· Congratulated the mahi and efforts of Place Group and Waikakariki Limited.

· Pleased to see the positive outcomes for local people.

· Commended the model for building environmental and social impacts.

12:51 pm – the meeting adjourned.

12:51 pm – Te Waiti Rangiwai withdrew during the adjournment.

1:10 pm – the meeting reconvened.

11. Failure of Quorum

Due to the departure of Te Waiti Rangiwai, Deputy Chair/member for Te Rūnanga
o Ngāti Whare, the quorum was lost and the meeting lapsed and adjourned at
1:10 pm.

Members in attendance were: Chair Maramena Vercoe, Miro Araroa, Cr Bill Clark,
Cr Toi Kai Rākau Iti, Cr Stacey Rose, Whakaeke Ritete, Ngapera Rangiaho, Clifford
Te Riini, Cr Alison Silcock, Cr Wilson James (Alternate), Karito Paul (Alternate).

12. Items Deferred

Due to a lack of quorum, members convened a workshop to receive an update on the following items, which were deferred to the next meeting of the Forum for receipt.

· Item 10.2 – Implementation for the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

· Item 10.3 – Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Work Plan 2020/21

· Item 11.1, Verbal Update: Glass Eel Study on the Rangitāiki River – 2020 Preliminary Sampling Results.

Confirmed

Maramena Vercoe

Chairperson, Rangitāiki River Forum



Pūrongo Ki: Report To:	Rangitāiki River Forum
Rā Hui: Meeting Date:	4 December 2020
Kaituhi Pūrongo: Report Writer:	Yvonne Tatton, Governance Manager
Kaiwhakamana Pūrongo: Report Authoriser:	Chris Ingle, General Manager, Integrated Catchments
Kaupapa: Purpose:	To consider and adopt proposed revisions to the Rangitaiki River Forum’s Terms of Reference and Standing Orders

Adoption of Revised Terms of Reference and Standing Orders and 2021 Meeting Dates

Whakarāpopototanga
Executive Summary

Following the workshop held in Taupō on 13 October, 2020, the Rangitaiki River Forum (Forum) is asked to consider and adopt amendments to the Terms of Reference and Standing Orders and the 2021 meeting schedule.

Ngā tūtohutanga
Recommendations

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Receives the report, Adoption of Revised Terms of Reference and Standing Orders and 2021 Meeting Dates.

2 Approves the Rangitaiki River Forum’s Terms of Reference as amended under Attachment 1.

3 Adopts the Rangitaiki River Forum’s Standing Orders as amended under Attachment 2 with a further amendment in regard to the Quorum for Meetings, by adopting one of the following provisions:

(a) The Quorum must include a member appointed by Ngāti Whare and a member appointed by Ngāti Manawa.

(b) The Quorum must include either one of Ngāti Manawa or Ngāti Whare members as part of the quorum.

4 Authorises the BOPRC Governance Manager, as the administering body, to make any necessary formatting and minor grammatical changes to the Standing Orders document as required.

5 Adopts the Rangitaiki River Forum’s 2021 schedule of meetings as listed below:

· Friday, 5 March 2021

· Friday, 4 June 2021

· Friday, 3 September 2021

· Friday, 3 December 2021

1. He Whakamārama
Background

1.1 Terms of Reference and Standing Orders

A Forum Workshop was held on 13 October 2020 to consider preferred options to guide amendments to be made to the Forum’s Terms of Reference and Standing Orders, based on the following reasons:

· Terms of Reference have not been updated to reflect the Forum’s Vision and Mission statements, and the relevant Treaty Settlement Acts and references.

· Standing Orders have not been updated since 2012. Local Government New Zealand recently provided an updated Standing Orders Model that are easier to understand both in language and format. Guidance on specific provisions was also sought in relation to: meeting quorum, Te Reo Maori, Forum tikanga, live streaming and venues.

Direction was provided by the Forum at the Workshop, and a revised Terms of Reference and Standing Orders is attached to the report for the Forum to consider and adopt (refer Attachments 1 and 2).

A summary of the proposed amendments are listed under section 2 of the report.

A remaining matter requires a further decision to be made by the Forum relating to the quorum requirement for meetings, which is discussed further under section 2.1 of the report.

1.2 2021 Schedule of Meetings

In consultation with the Forum Chair and Deputy Chair, the following dates are proposed for the Forum’s 2021 Schedule of Meetings and are provided for adoption.

· Friday 5 March 2020

· Friday 4 June 2020

· Friday 3 September 2020

· Friday 3 December 2020

These dates align with the current and previous meeting cycles, which have been scheduled at the beginning of each quarter.

Adjustments and changes to the meeting dates may occur, where unforeseen conflicts arise. Where changes are required or requested, approval will be sought from the Forum Chair and Deputy Chair.

As the meeting venues change throughout the year, these will be confirmed on an individual basis.

2. Proposed Amendments to the Terms of Reference and Standing Orders

A summary of the proposed amendments are listed below for the Forum to consider and adopt.

1. Terms of Reference

· Inclusion of reference to the Forum’s Vision and Mission as adopted in 2019.

· Remove references to Deed of Settlement and River Document process that have been superseded and/or are now completed, and update with the relevant Treaty Settlement Acts.

2. Standing Orders

Matter	Direction
1 Quorum membership	The issue regarding Ngāti Whare and Mgati Manawa members forming part of the quorum is to be further discussed and resolved at the meeting
2 Addressing the meeting in Te Reo Māori	Delete requirement that a member must give prior notice, not less than 2 working days before the meeting, to the Chair if he/she intend to address the Chair in Māori, when the normal business of the committee is conducted in English.
3 Translation of Te Reo Māori spoken at meetings	Members respectfully offer a summary of their korero in English if they so wish (apart from korero which is tapu e.g. karakia, tauparapara).
4 Minuting of Te Reo Māori	Include Te Reo Māori in the formal Minutes of the meeting where appropriate.
5 Live streaming of meetings	Include the provision for livestream (web casting) the Forum’s public meetings with livestreaming for future proofing and livestreaming only by agreement of the Chair.
6 Venue	Continue to rotate meetings across Whakatāne, Edgecumbe, Murupara and Taupō to ensure geographical spread for Members. Include the ability to hold workshops via Zoom or similar technology.
7 Forum Tikanga	Members to abide by marae protocol when on marae.
8 Update version	Update current Standing Orders to the latest version and include partner logos on the front cover.

2.1 Standing Order for Meeting Quorum

A remaining matter that requires a further decision by the Forum is the quorum requirement for meetings.

Direction was provided by members at the Forum’s Workshop for this matter to be discussed further at this meeting, with the following suggestions raised for consideration:

a) Maintaining the status quo recognises the historical importance of the Ngāti Manawa and Ngāti Whare Treaty Settlements.

b) Having either one of Ngāti Manawa and Ngāti Whare members rather than both members as part of the quorum, allows meetings to proceed when one of them cannot be present.

The report asks the Forum to make a decision on the meeting quorum requirement regarding the status of the Ngāti whare and Ngāti Manawa members to incorporate into the amended Standing Orders.

3. Legislative Framework

The Forum’s Terms of Reference derive from the Ngāti Whare Claims Settlement Act 2012 and Ngāti Manawa Claims Settlement Act 2012, and ensuing Tūhoe Claims Settlement Act 2014, Hineuru Claims Settlement Act 2016, and Ngāti Tūwharetoa Claims Settlement Act 2018.

The Forum is a joint committee under the Local Government Act 2002, which requires Standing Orders that contain rules for the conduct of the meetings. Their purpose is to enable the Forum to exercise their decision-making responsibilities in a transparent, inclusive and lawful manner. The Rangitāiki River Forum Standing Orders include reference to the meeting requirements set out in specific relevant legislation, i.e. Ngāti Whare Claims Settlement Act 2012, Ngāti Manawa Claims Settlement Act 2012, the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA). Standing Orders cannot contravene any requirements contained in any of the Acts.

4. Ngā Whakaarohanga
Considerations

4.1 Ngā Mōrea me Ngā Whakangāwaritanga
Risks and Mitigations

There are no significant risks associated with this matter.

4.2 Huringa Āhuarangi
Climate Change

The matters addressed in this report are of a procedural nature and there is no need to consider climate change impacts.

4.3 Ngā Pānga ki te Māori
Implications for Māori

The proposed amendments made to the Forum’s Terms of Reference and Standing Orders reflect the relevant Treaty Settlement legislation and Forum’s vision and mission statements; and establish processes that provide for Tikanga Māori and
Te Reo Māori within the Forum’s Standing Orders and meeting processes.

4.4 Whakawhitiwhiti ā-Hapori
Community Engagement

Engagement with the community is not required as the recommended proposal / decision relates to internal Forum matters only.

4.5 Ngā Pānga ā-Pūtea
Financial Implications

There are no material unbudgeted financial implications and this fits within the allocated budget.

5. Ngā Mahi Whai Ake
Next Steps

Once adopted and minor formatting changes and cover pages have been finalised, the Terms of Reference, Standing Orders and 2021 Schedule of Meetings will be implemented. Each member will receive a copy of Standing Orders and the new versions will be made available on the Bay of Plenty Regional Council website www.boprc.govt.nz. Meetings will be publicly notified in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002.

Tuhinga Tautoko
Attachments

Attachment 1 - 2020.11.17 Draft Revised Rangitaiki River Forum Term of Reference ⇩

Attachment 2 - 2020.11.20 RRF Revised Standing Orders ⇩



Pūrongo Ki: Report To:	Rangitāiki River Forum
Rā Hui: Meeting Date:	4 December 2020
Kaituhi Pūrongo: Report Writer:	Shari Kameta, Committee Advisor
Kaiwhakamana Pūrongo: Report Authoriser:	Yvonne Tatton, Governance Manager Chris Ingle, General Manager, Integrated Catchments
Kaupapa: Purpose:	To appoint the Chairperson of Rangitāiki River Forum for the next three year term.

Appointment of Chairperson

Whakarāpopototanga
Executive Summary

The current three year term appointment of the Rangitāiki River Forum Chairperson expires in December 2020, therefore the Forum is required to reappoint a Chairperson for the next three year term.

Ngā tūtohutanga
Recommendations

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Receives the report, Appointment of Chairperson.

2 Selects System B as the voting system to elect the Chairperson.

3 Elects ________________________ as the Chairperson of the Rangitāiki River Forum effective from the next meeting of the Rangitāiki River Forum.

1. He Whakamārama
Background

Maramena Vercoe (Ngāti Manawa) has completed a three year term as the Chair of the Rangitāiki River Forum, therefore the Forum may reappoint the current Chair or appoint a new Chair.

The provisions for appointment of the Chair are set out under Rangitāiki River Forum Standing Order 2.5:

• The appointment is for a term of 3 years, unless the Chair resigns or is removed by the Forum during that term.

• The Chair may be reappointed or removed by the Forum.

• The appointment must be decided at a meeting by vote and by the majority of members present and voting.

2. Voting Systems

The Forum must resolve to use one of the following voting systems, as set out on pages 14 and 15 of the Standing Orders:

“System A

(a) requires that a person is elected or appointed if he or she receives the votes of a majority of the members of the Forum voting; and

(b) has the following characteristics:

(i) there is a first round of voting for all candidates; and

(ii) if no candidate is successful in that round there is a second round of voting from which the candidate with the fewest votes in the first round is excluded; and

(iii) If no candidate is successful in the second round there is a third, and if necessary subsequent round of voting from which, each time, the candidate with the fewest votes in the previous round is excluded; and

(iv) In any round of voting if 2 or more candidates tie for the lowest number of votes, the person excluded from the next round is resolved by lot.

System B

(a) requires that a person is elected or appointed if he or she receives more votes than any other candidate; and

(b) has the following characteristics:

(i) there is only one round of voting; and

(ii) if 2 or more candidates tie for the most votes, the tie is resolved by lot.”

It is recommended that the Forum selects System B as its voting system.

3. The Voting Process

It is advised that the Chairperson vacates the chair and the Deputy Chair assumes the chair for this item.

1. The Forum resolves to adopt a voting system and the procedure in the event of a tie.

2. The Deputy Chair calls for nominations for Chairperson (nominated and seconded).

3. Nominees may be allowed up to 10 minutes to make a presentation.

4. Voting for the appointment of the Chairperson as per agreed system.

5. Chairperson declared elected.

6. It is proposed the new Chairperson’s appointment take effect at the next meeting of the Rangitāiki River Forum.

The Chairperson then assumes the role of the chair and presides over

In agreeing the voting process, ground rules are also agreed.

Ground Rules

a) A member may nominate or second themselves.

Any member may call for a Division – where the names of members voting for and against and any abstentions, are taken down in random order.

4. Ngā Whakaarohanga
Considerations

4.1 Ngā Mōrea me Ngā Whakangāwaritanga
Risks and Mitigations

There are no significant risks associated with this decision.

4.2 Huringa Āhuarangi
Climate Change

The matters addressed in this report are of a procedural nature and there is no need to consider climate change impacts.

4.3 Ngā Pānga ki te Māori
Implications for Māori

There are no significant implications for Maori associated with this decision.

4.4 Whakawhitiwhiti ā-Hapori
Community Engagement

Engagement with the community is not required as the recommended proposal / decision relates to procedural matters only.

4.5 Ngā Pānga ā-Pūtea
Financial Implications

There are no material unbudgeted financial implications and this fits within the allocated budget.

5. Ngā Mahi Whai Ake
Next Steps

The appointed Chairperson will assume the role of the Chair of the Rangitāiki River Forum at the next meeting and remain for a term of three years until December 2023 unless other circumstances dictate.



Pūrongo Ki: Report To:	Rangitāiki River Forum
Rā Hui: Meeting Date:	4 December 2020
Kaituhi Pūrongo: Report Writer:	Micah Butt, Senior Maori Resource Management Advisor
Kaiwhakamana Pūrongo: Report Authoriser:	Namouta Poutasi, General Manager, Strategy & Science
Kaupapa: Purpose:	To outline upcoming shifts in response to implementation of the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020.

Implementation for the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

Whakarāpopototanga
Executive Summary

On 5 August 2020 the Government gazetted the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPSFM) and added further amendments to the policy.

This paper provides:

· An overview on the key changes to the NPSFM that are relevant to the Rangitāiki River Forum (RRF); and

· Indicates the forward work programme resulting from the changes to the NPSFM; and

· Seeks Guidance from RRF about their involvement and role in this work.

One key requirement is to fully implement the new NPSFM 2020 for the whole region by December 2024.

With the scale of the work ahead and the dynamic regional iwi landscape, Toi Moana has designed an approach to involve tangata whenua that recognises the obligations placed on Toi Moana to implement the NPSFM and the contribution of tangata whenua through enhanced involvement. This approach is set out in Te Hononga: Bay of Plenty Regional Council’s Māori Relationships and Engagement Plan for the implementation of the NPSFM 2020.

Te Hononga presents several possible collaborative options of working alongside tangata whenua. How Toi Moana engages and works with tangata whenua is critical to the successful implementation of the NPSFM.

This paper seeks guidance from the RRF on how they wish to participate in the mahi involved in implementing the NPSFM and also in the review of the Regional Natural Resources Plan (water and land sections) and implementation of the new NPSFM 2020.

Ngā tūtohutanga
Recommendations

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Receives the report, Implementation for the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management.

2 Provides guidance on preferences for involvement in the engagement approaches outlined in Te Hononga.

1. He Whakamārama
Background

In September 2019 the Government initiated consultation on the Action for Healthy Waterways package designed to:

· Stop further degradation of New Zealand’s freshwater resources and improve water quality within five years.

· Reverse past damage and bring New Zealand’s freshwater resources, waterways and ecosystems to a healthy state within a generation.

The RRF considered the freshwater proposals in September 2019 and made a submission to the Government on the Action for Healthy Waterways package.

On 28 May 2020 the Government made decisions on the Action for Healthy Waterways package, which will result in:

· RMA Amendments

· An amended National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020

· A new National Environmental Standard for Freshwater

· New RMA s.360 regulations

· Amendments to the Resource Management (Measurement and Reporting of Water Takes) Regulations 2010.

This paper focusses on key changes for implementing the amended NPSFM 2020 relevant to role and function of the RRF.

One major change will be a requirement to fully implement the NPSFM 2020 no later than 31 December 2024.

Key policy provisions in the new NPSFM 2020 with respect to kaupapa Māori include:

· Introduction of a hierarchy of obligations with respect to the application of Te Mana o Te Wai. The hierarchy sets the first priority as the health and well-being of waterbodies and freshwater ecosystems; second, the essential needs of the people; and third, the ability of people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural well-being, now and in the future.

· Regional councils must include an objective in their regional policy statement that gives effect to Te Mana o Te Wai.

· A Vision statement with respect to Te Mana o Te Wai which reflects the local context.

· Introduction of a new compulsory value, Mahinga Kai that will require a collaborative or partnership approach with Maori to identify values and associated attributes to monitor those values.

· Strengthened direction relating to the involvement of iwi and hapū.

Further information including a summary of government’s decisions, an information sheet for iwi / Māori, the cabinet papers and summary of submissions are available on the MfE website.

2. Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki – Pathways of the Rangitāiki

The Forum has set out the vision, objectives, and desired outcomes for the Rangitāiki River in Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki Pathways of the Rangitāiki, which is now recognised and provided for in the Regional Policy Statement (in October 2018). On 6 September 2019, the Forum has adopted the vision ‘Te Mana o Te Wai’ and the mission ‘Te Reo o te wai – Te Mana’. The vision (Wawata) and objectives of the River Document, Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki were inclusive and complimentary to the concepts. In alignment with the Forum’s view, Te Mana o Te Wai is further explained and strengthened in the NPSFM 2020.

Albeit further work will be required to implement the NPSFM 2020 for the Rangitāiki Catchment, there is already a firm direction set by the river document.

3. Te Hononga

Te Hononga: The Regional Māori Engagement Plan for Implementing the NPSFM (2020) (Attachment 1) is Toi Moana’s Māori Engagement Plan for the NPSFM 2020 Implementation Programme. It has been informed by engagement on the current plan changes, Long Term Plan (LTP) submissions, Komiti Māori hui, surveys and the requirements of the draft NPSFM provisions. Te Hononga provides direction on what must be considered to involve tangata whenua.

The majority of tangata whenua groups expect kanohi ki te kanohi or face to face meetings with Toi Moana staff in the initial stages to understand the requirements of the NPSFM 2020. Early discussions with tangata whenua will guide Toi Moana on how engagement should be undertaken based on the options presented in Te Hononga.

The practicalities of implementation are, however, constrained by the Government imposed timeframe and size of the work program.

Te Hononga sets out potential approaches to work with tangata whenua, and for tangata whenua to express their preference for how they would like to be involved. Each option can be combined with others, or, as a singular approach to engagement and include:

• Kaitiaki Reference Groups (specialist practitioners)

These include practitioners and iwi technical groups or individuals who can provide advice on the application of mātauranga Māori and offer solutions on how it may be applied in the planning and policy framework.

• Taiao Hubs

Similar to the Kaitiaki Reference Groups described above, in this case Toi Moana staff would work with tangata whenua at either a regional or sub-regional level.

• Collectives

There are iwi who have close whakapapa associations and share similar issues that may choose to collaborate as a collective.

• Sub-Regional Hui

Sub-regional hui provide opportunity to raise the awareness of the RNRP review and NPSFM work on a larger scale. Not as effective as some of the other options, but can include a broader range of interests.

• Consultants

Consultants, working on behalf of iwi, or for Toi Moana, can be an effective and efficient way of undertaking a large amount of work. They can take pressure off iwi representatives and Toi Moana staff resources that may be needed for other work.

• Co-governance and Komiti Māori

Komiti Māori has large regional networks and long held associations with tangata whenua. Tasked with providing direction on the engagement approach, this committee provides an additional strategic lens at the local and regional levels.

The Rangitāiki River Forum (RRF), Te Maru o Kaituna (TMoK) and Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Strategy Group (RTALSG) are statutory entities established via Treaty settlement legislation. Toi Moana will seek guidance from co-governance entities on what their preferences for involvement are.

4. NPSFM 2020 Implementation

4.1 Key Shifts

Toi Moana will consider the latest amendments in detail and the work that will be required at its November 2020 Strategy and Policy Committee meeting. Key aspects of the policy are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1 - Key matters to be considered for the NPSFM Implementation and RNRP review work programme.

Proposal
Plan changes One RPS change and one RNRP plan change notified no later than 31 December 2024.
Regional Natural Resources Plan (RNRP) review Include review of the RNRP (land and water sections).
Apply consistent technical and planning methods and approaches across the region, to support Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) based setting of values, objectives, limits and, where necessary, methods.
Data/information and modelling Apply the information, data and models we already have. Rely on simple models and expert advice where necessary.
Komiti Māori and Co-governance advice on matters relevant to their authority Komiti Māori receive reports relating to involvement of iwi/hapū and Kaupapa Māori planning topics. Co-governance bodies receive reports on involvement of iwi /hapū, Kaupapa Māori planning topics, and Water Management Area (WMA) work in their jurisdictional area and relevant to their purpose & functions and statutory documents.
Reporting to Committees and Co-governance Report on key policy decision matters only, given the breadth of work to be delivered.
Community Engagement Intensive public and key stakeholder engagement on draft issues, options and plan changes (2023). Communication and information sharing by e-newsletters and web-pages. Territorial Local Authorities Forum provides and avenue for early advice and review. Regional Water Advisory Panel as avenue for industry and non-government organisations to provide early advice and review.

Proposal

Plan changes

One RPS change and one RNRP plan change notified no later than 31 December 2024.

Regional Natural Resources Plan (RNRP) review

Include review of the RNRP (land and water sections).

Apply consistent technical and planning methods and approaches across the region, to support Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) based setting of values, objectives, limits and, where necessary, methods.

Data/information and modelling

Apply the information, data and models we already have. Rely on simple models and expert advice where necessary.

Komiti Māori and Co-governance advice on matters relevant to their authority

Komiti Māori receive reports relating to involvement of iwi/hapū and Kaupapa Māori planning topics.

Co-governance bodies receive reports on involvement of iwi /hapū, Kaupapa Māori planning topics, and Water Management Area (WMA) work in their jurisdictional area and relevant to their purpose & functions and statutory documents.

Reporting to Committees and Co-governance

Report on key policy decision matters only, given the breadth of work to be delivered.

Community Engagement

Intensive public and key stakeholder engagement on draft issues, options and plan changes (2023).

Communication and information sharing by e-newsletters and web-pages.

Territorial Local Authorities Forum provides and avenue for early advice and review.

Regional Water Advisory Panel as avenue for industry and non-government organisations to provide early advice and review.

4.2 Kaupapa Māori Mahi

Implementation of the NPSFM 2020 will require a set of deliverables to ensure tangata whenua values and the associated tributes are integrated through analysis and policy development. In regard to the key kaupapa Māori provisions in the NPSFM 2020, the following table provides an indicative outline of the kaupapa Māori work programme.

Table 2 - Indicative Kaupapa Māori Components

Topic	Description
Set Water Quality Limits and Manage According to National Objectives Framework (NOF) attributes	Gain an understanding of how a contaminant level, or other related freshwater quality characteristic impacts cultural values.
Set Water Quantity Limits	Find ways of linking water levels in rivers and streams to cultural values, i.e., express how cultural values are affected by modified river flows.
Develop More Appropriate Frameworks for freshwater management	Discussions need to consider the following points: · Te Mana o Te Wai - work on how Te Mana o Te Wai shapes policy as it will affect all aspects of freshwater management. Communities will have a critical role in shaping a regional perspective on Te Mana o Te Wai. · The Regional Natural Resources Plan (RNRP) will be reviewed including the Kaitiakitanga section and content relevant to water and land. All parts of the plan need to be considered together.
Holistically Monitor	Toi Moana’s monitoring programme is informed by conventional science. The NPSFM requires us to incorporate mātauranga Māori into the monitoring program. Tangata whenua will play a central role on how mātauranga will be integrated into the planning and policy framework.
Involve in Freshwater Management	The NPSFM 2020 reflects the governments recognition of the relationship tangata whenua have with freshwater bodies and the requirement to enhance their involvement in the design and engagement process.

Responding to the timeframes

The NPSFM will still require Freshwater Management Units (FMUs) to be identified based on identification of values and objective setting. Community engagement will continue to be undertaken at a localised Water Management Area (WMA) scale. Successful implementation of the NPSFM will require understanding of local values and aspirations of tangata whenua, and of the wider community. However, achievement of the bottom lines set out in the NPSFM must also be incorporated.

Implications for Current Freshwater Plan Change 12 and Proposed Plan Change 9 to the RNRP.

A region wide approach is now being considered to implement the NPSFM 2020 in the timeframe set. A key shift is there will likely be one RPS change and one RNRP plan change notified no later than 31 December 2024 rather than changes for each of the Water Management Areas. This means that Proposed Plan Change 12 (PC 12) will not likely proceed in its current form and will be integrated into changes to be notified in 2024. The visions in the river documents are embedded in the RPS and will guide and inform the setting of visions now required under the NPSFM.

The Region-wide Water Quantity Proposed Plan Change 9 (PC 9) was designed as an interim measure that would ‘hold the line’ on water quantity management until the confirmation National Policy Statement of Freshwater Management 2020 which was formally released on 5 August 2020. Toi Moana formally resolved to withdraw PC 9 on 18 February 2020.

The NPSFM 2020 will supersede any provisions established via PC 9 in particular the role of Te Mana o Te Wai. Toi Moana had always intended to address those issues as part of the next stage of its freshwater planning once the national policy direction is clear.

To this end Toi Moana has developed Te Hononga, as described above in section 2 and this is based on best practice identified by tangata whenua reflecting on PC 9 engagement to ensure that tangata whenua have a meaningful role in the setting of regional freshwater policy.

5. Information and Reporting to RRF

Co-governance bodies in the Bay of Plenty region including RRF each have legislated scope and functions which interface with the RNRP review and NPSFM Implementation work programme. Some entities have river documents, which in time will all be recognised and provided for in the RPS. The status of these documents are such that Toi Moana has an obligation to ensure that the objectives and desired outcomes are recognised and provided for in any plan changes relevant to the particular awa.

Toi Moana seeks to ensure that critical information and the opportunities afforded in this kaupapa align with responsibilities outlined in the relevant Treaty Settlement legislation and terms of reference underpinning the co-governance entities. For RRF these include:

· To promote the integrated and coordinated management of the Rangitāiki River.

· To engage with and provide advice to Local Authorities on statutory and non-statutory processes and also to Crown Agencies that exercise functions in relation to the Rangitāiki River.

· To monitor the extent to which the Forum is achieving its purpose including the implementation and the effectiveness of the Rangitāiki River Document.

· To gather information, to disseminate information and to hold meetings.

Given the potential complexities ahead it is important that the way we work is agile and adaptable, and that communication is open and clear to ensure efficient use of time and resources for both RRF and Toi Moana.

To this end Toi Moana seeks agreement from RRF on the way we work together through the RNRP review and NPSFM implementation process. Toi Moana staff recommend information and reporting outlined below:

· Informal regular updates are provided by way of an email newsletter;

· Key papers that will go to the Toi Moana Strategy and Policy Committee for decisions relevant to the Rangitāiki River and its tributaries, are brought to RRF first for advice and recommendations to the Strategy and Policy Committee. This will include policy papers relating specifically to the Rangitaiki co-governance framework area. For other topics, the Strategy and Policy Committee papers can simply be provided to RRF for their information as requested.

6. Ngā Whakaarohanga
Considerations

6.1 Ngā Mōrea me Ngā Whakangāwaritanga
Risks and Mitigations

This paper signals key shifts required for Toi Moana’s NPSFM Implementation and RNRP review work programme. Now the NPSFM 2020 has been gazetted, Toi Moana staff will hone the work programme which will be considered before making decisions on changes to the programme at the Strategy and Policy meeting in November.

6.2 Huringa Āhuarangi
Climate Change

The matters addressed in this report are of a procedural nature and there is no need to consider climate change impacts at this stage. Climate change considerations will be factored into the RNRP review and NPSFM implementation work programme.

6.3 Ngā Pānga ki te Māori
Implications for Māori

This paper provides advice and information on Toi Moana’s plan to engage with Māori on the RNRP review and NPSFM implementation programme. How Toi Moana engages and works with tangata whenua is critical to the successful implementation of the NPSFM and review of the RNRP. Please refer to Te Hononga (attached) and the above sections.

6.4 Whakawhitiwhiti ā-Hapori
Community Engagement

One of the key focusses of this paper is possible options for engagement with Māori which precedes engagement with wider community stakeholders. RPS and RNRP changes will require wider community engagement which will be developed as part of the programme.

6.5 Ngā Pānga ā-Pūtea
Financial Implications

There are no material unbudgeted financial implications.

7. Ngā Mahi Whai Ake
Next Steps

Gazetting of the NPSFM will now require Toi Moana staff to further consider key shifts in the RNRP review and NPSFM Implementation work programme. Staff will prepare a more detailed Māori engagement plan for the region/sub-regions as soon as possible, following discussions with iwi.

Toi Moana will report back to RRF for advice and recommendations before key decisions are made.

Tuhinga Tautoko
Attachments

Attachment 1 - Te Hononga Regional Maori Engagement Plan FINAL ⇩

Attachment 2 - Iwi and Hapu Interests and Values in Fresh Water Document ⇩



Pūrongo Ki: Report To:	Rangitāiki River Forum
Rā Hui: Meeting Date:	4 December 2020
Kaituhi Pūrongo: Report Writer:	Charles Harley, Team Leader Eastern Catchments
Kaiwhakamana Pūrongo: Report Authoriser:	Chris Ingle, General Manager, Integrated Catchments
Kaupapa: Purpose:	The purpose of this report is to inform the Rangitāiki River Forum of the Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Work Plan 2020/2021.

Rangitaiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Work Plan 2020/2021

Whakarāpopototanga
Executive Summary

The Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme coordinates and integrates work in the Rangitāiki River catchment. It covers all significant activities (both projects and ongoing work) carried out by Taupō District Council, Whakatāne District Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council, pertaining to the Rangitāiki catchment.

The annual work plan describes the Programme projects and how they connect to the Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki – Pathways of the Rangitaiki, budgets and deliverables for the 2020/2021 financial year.

Ngā tūtohutanga
Recommendations

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Receives the report, Rangitaiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Work Plan 2020/2021.

1. He Whakamārama
Background

The Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme was established in 2014/2015 to deliver on the community’s expectations for the health of the Rangitāiki River and to support the Rangitāiki River Strategy, Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki – Pathways of the Rangitāiki. The programme coordinates, prioritises and delivers on all the work of Whakatāne District Council, Taupō District Council and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council related to the river catchment.

2. 2020/2021 Annual Work Plan

The Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme Annual Work Plan 2020/2021 is attached. The work has been approved through the three council’s Long Term Plans.

The annual work plan describes projects, budgets and deliverables for the next financial year, including where the Councils will be working in relation to the actions of Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki.

Priorities for this year’s programme include:

· Whakatāne District Council – Wastewater Investigations

· Taupō District Council District Plan Review.

· Continue improving fish passage through culverts and fish surveys.

· Continue to implement the Rangitaiki Wetlands Restoration Project.

· Work with landowners to protect water quality particularly for the new Focus Catchment area of the upper Rangitāiki/Otangimoana.

· Implement the NPS and NES for Freshwater; which also deliver actions within Te Ara Whānui o Rangitaiki – Pathways to the Rangitāiki.

· Regional Council surveillance and control of dama wallabies and control of alligator weed and wilding conifer sites with the Rangitaiki Catchment.

· Review the Regional Council’s Floodway and Drainage Bylaw 2008, undertake Stages 6 and 7 of the Rangitāiki Floodway project.

3. Ngā Whakaarohanga
Considerations

3.1 Huringa Āhuarangi
Climate Change

Regional Council’s engineering work helps cope with the effects of climate change, for example the Rangitaiki floodway builds climate change resilience. Climate change considerations will be factored in to the implementation of the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management and Regional Natural Resources Plan.

3.2 Ngā Pānga ki te Māori
Implications for Māori

As the Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme is integrated into the Rangitāiki River Strategy, Te Ara Whānui o Rangitāiki – Pathways of the Rangitāiki, Rangitāiki River Forum member organisations are involved in the programme allowing an adaptive and collaborative approach to managing the river catchment.

3.3 Ngā Pānga ā-Pūtea
Financial Implications

There are no material unbudgeted financial implications.

4. Ngā Mahi Whai Ake
Next Steps

The Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme Annual Report 2020/2021 will be presented to the Rangitāiki River Forum in September 2021. The report will outline the results of the work plan for 2020/2021.

Tuhinga Tautoko
Attachments

Attachment 1 - Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Work Plan 2020/2021 ⇩



Pūrongo Ki: Report To:	Rangitāiki River Forum
Rā Hui: Meeting Date:	4 December 2020
Kaituhi Pūrongo: Report Writer:	Fiona Wood, Programme Coordinator Integrated Catchments and Charles Harley, Team Leader Eastern Catchments
Kaiwhakamana Pūrongo: Report Authoriser:	Chris Ingle, General Manager, Integrated Catchments
Kaupapa: Purpose:	The purpose of this report is to inform the Rangitāiki River Forum of the Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme Annual Report 2019/2020

Rangitaiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Report 2019-2020

Whakarāpopototanga
Executive Summary

The Rangitāiki Catchment Programme coordinates and integrates work in the Rangitāiki River Catchment. It covers all significant activities (both projects and ongoing work) carried out by Taupō District Council, Whakatāne District Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council, where it affects the awa. The annual report outlines progress against the 2019/20 annual work plan.

Ngā tūtohutanga
Recommendations

That the Rangitāiki River Forum:

1 Receives the report, Rangitaiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Report 2019-2020.

1. He Whakamārama
Background

The Rangitāiki Catchment Programme was established in 2014/2015 to deliver on the communities expectations for the health of the Rangitāiki River and to support the Rangitāiki River Strategy Te Ara Whanui o Rangitāiki – Pathways of the Rangitāiki; Rangitāiki River Forum member organisations are involved in the programme allowing an adaptive and collaborative approach to managing the river catchment.

2. 2019-2020 Annual Work Plan Results

It has been a successful year in relation to getting work underway or completed, there were 37 projects in the 2019-2020 annual work plan. Of these 30 are achieved and or are taking place and on-track for completion within approved timeframes. Seven projects have a red status. A supporting document titled ‘Rangitāiki Catchment Programme: Annual Report 2019-2020 is attached to your agenda.

2019-2020 Programme Highlights

Papa Taonga (community open space on College Road) was officially opened at a ribbon cutting ceremony on 21 December 2019. The ribbon cutting was undertaken by grandchildren of the various previous property owners. Regional Council approved a grant of up to $100,000 for the development of the site. The physical works were managed by Whakatāne District Council in collaboration with the community, Edgecumbe Collective and the Regional Council.

A culvert conveying the Waikuku Stream underneath Galatea Road was upsized and replaced, this improves the resilience of Galatea Road.

The transport network (by Te Whāiti and Ruatāhuna) was severely impacted by storms, causing problems to the resilience of the roading network and delays in navigating the road. The corridor has been reinstated to allow vehicle access through.

The Horomanga Bridge was reinstated providing a permanent safe access and improves the resilience of Troutbeck Road.

Five hundred and sixty five small instream structures have been assessed to determine potential barriers to fish migration within the Rangitāiki Catchment. Ninety one require remediation, this work will be carried out in 2020-2021.

The Focus Catchment Action Plan for the upper Rangitāiki/Otangimoana has been finalised and implementation is in progress with external consultant, BOPRC and landowners working together to develop future farm planning.

Freshwater Improvement Fund – Wetland Restoration Project has provided the opportunity to use the skills of local contractors to undertake many different pieces of work across this project in the past year.

Flood Recovery Project – as at 30 July, 152 out of the 224 riverbank repair sites for the Rangitāiki-Tarawera Rivers Scheme have either been completed or identified as no longer required.

The Flood Protection and Drainage Bylaws underwent a full review under the Local Government Act 2002, in 2019-2020. Pre-engagement was carried out with key stakeholders in August – November 2019; formal engagement occurred in March – April 2020, and Council received 43 submissions. COVID-19 legislation allowed the Bylaws review process to proceed beyond June 20, which allowed Council to undertake further targeted engagement, particularly with those iwi/hapū that provided submissions.

3. Ngā Whakaarohanga
Considerations

3.1 Huringa Āhuarangi
Climate Change

Regional Council’s engineering work responds to the effects of climate change across the region, for example the Rangitaiki floodway is planned to improve community climate change resilience. Ongoing adaptation by the Programme is necessary to respond to the impacts of climate change.

3.2 Ngā Pānga ki te Māori
Implications for Māori

The report provides information relating to actions that support the delivery of Te Ara Whanui o Rangitāiki – Pathways of the Rangitāiki, which supports positive implications for Māori long term. Te Ara Whanui o Rangitāiki is required by legislation and takes into consideration all the legislative and planning documents of importance to Māori. In addition council takes into account iwi and hapū planning documents and Te Tiriti o Waitangi as required in the Regional Policy Statement which also contains a section with direct reference to Te Ara Whanui o Rangitāiki.

4. Ngā Mahi Whai Ake
Next Steps

The Rangitāiki Integrated Catchment Programme will be implementing the projects listed in the Annual Work Plan 2020-2021.

Tuhinga Tautoko
Attachments

Attachment 1 - Rangitaiki Integrated Catchment Programme: Annual Report 2019-2020 ⇩